<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>NCTE</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/publisher/NCTE</link>
	<description>A listing of works published by NCTE in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Remix as &quot;Fair Use&quot;: Grateful Dead Posters&apos; Re-Publication Held to Be a Transformative, Fair Use</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/28831.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/28831.html</guid>
		<description>On May 9, 2006, in Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the lower court, finding the use of several Grateful Dead Poster images appearing in a band biography was a &apos;fair use&apos; under section 107 of the US copyright statute. In the case, the publisher Dorling Kindersley used without permission seven images of Grateful Dead concert posters or tickets in the book Grateful Dead: The Illustrated Trip (2003). Prior to the book&apos;s publication, the publisher had unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate permissions with the copyright holder, Bill Graham Archives. Due to what the publisher perceived as an unreasonable licensing fee, permission agreements were never reached. Nonetheless, the publisher used the seven images in the book, incorporating them into remixed compositions, consisting of collages mixed with graphic art and textual explanations and commentary. Over 2000 images were used in the book. After the book&apos;s publication, Bill Graham Archives brought suit for copyright infringement, and requested an injunction blocking further publication.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Professional Email Assignment </title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/28829.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/28829.html</guid>
		<description>As the semester&apos;s first assignment in a first-year writing course, I have used the professional e-mail assignment for several years in both face-to-face (f2f) and virtual classes, and have experienced great success as well as positive feedback from students. I have also shared this assignment with colleagues who have remarked on the value of critically thinking about e-mail since the genre cuts across every class, every discipline, and almost all employment and home situations. The assignment also sets the tone for all of my assignments because it fits within my pedagogical/theoretical framework, incorporating three important principles: community, critical engagement, and application (Digital 231). As with all of my assignments, this one has a theoretical underpinning, is framed by readings, is distributed to students via a written document that itself serves as &apos;good writing,&apos; provides scaffolding for later assignments, and emphasizes digital literacies that are crucial if students are to be engaged and empowered citizens.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>NCTE Beliefs about the Teaching of Writing</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/25580.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/25580.html</guid>
		<description>Just as the nature of and expectation for literacy has changed in the past century and a half, so has the nature of writing. Much of that change has been due to technological developments, from pen and paper, to typewriter, to word processor, to networked computer, to design software capable of composing words, images, and sounds.  These developments not only expanded the types of texts that writers produce, they also expanded immediate access to a wider variety of readers.  With full recognition that writing is an increasingly multifaceted activity, we offer several principles that should guide effective teaching practice.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Grease on the Keyboard: Making Composition Work in a Technical College</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14975.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14975.html</guid>
		<description>Times have changed. The industrial age has become the information age, and technology and equipment evolve at such a rapid pace that it is wasteful to train a person for only specific psychomotor skills. Employers are calling for the hands-on training to be combined with more communication and critical thinking skills so that employees have a broader education that allows them to switch speeds or tasks.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Collaborative Projects in a Technical Writing Class: A Cost/Benefit Analysis</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14043.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14043.html</guid>
		<description>With the shift in writing pedagogy from&#xD;product to process, from emphasizing the&#xD;individual writing--in a vacuum--to emphasizing&#xD;the social context and social&#xD;nature of writing, collaboration of some&#xD;sort has found a place in most writing&#xD;classes. The inclusion of collaborative&#xD;projects in technical writing courses has&#xD;a second, practical justification: the idea&#xD;that these courses should prepare students for writing on the job, where collaborative writing is common.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Teaching about Plagiarism in the Age of the Internet</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14044.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14044.html</guid>
		<description>Things have changed since I began teaching research writing ten years ago. I used&#xD;to require students to use at least one electronic source; now, I require that students use at least one paper source. Students used to start their search at the card catalog; now they log onto the Internet. Of course, the change has been gradual, but I have begun to ask what this shift from paper to electronic sources means to academic integrity.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/publisher/NCTE.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>