<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/publisher/Behavior_Research_Methods,_Instruments_and_Computers</link>
	<description>A listing of works published by Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Beyond the Five-User Assumption: Benefits of Increased Sample Sizes in Usability Testing</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/27411.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/27411.html</guid>
		<description>It is widely assumed that 5 participants suffice for usability testing. In this study, 60 users were tested and random sets of 5 or more were sampled from the whole, to demonstrate the risks of using only 5 participants and the benefits of using more. Some of the randomly selected sets of 5 participants found 99% of the problems; other sets found only 55%. With 10 users, the lowest percentage of problems revealed by any one set was increased to 80%, and with 20 users, to 95%.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/publisher/Behavior_Research_Methods,_Instruments_and_Computers.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>