A directory of resources inthe field of technical communication.

Usability>Testing

151-166 of 166 found. Page 7 of 7.

About this Site | Advanced Search | Localization | Site Maps
 

« PREVIOUS PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Usability testing is a technique used to evaluate a prototype of a product by testing it on users. This can be seen as an irreplaceable usability practice, since it gives direct input on how real users will use the system.

 

151.
#34503

Tips For Effective Usability Testing In India

An introduction to usability testing and 15 tips for effective usability testing in India. Created and presented by Abhay Rautela at the Management Development Institute, Gurgaon, India during the second day of Bar Camp Delhi 6.

Rautela, Abhay. SlideShare (2009). Presentations>Usability>Testing>India

152.
#34536

Five Reasons Why a Digital Agency Should Take Usability Seriously

Many digital agencies are now talking about usability and including it in their offering, but few are incorporating into their everyday process. Here are some reasons why agencies should think seriously about integrating usability and usability testing into their offering.

Experience Solutions (2009). Articles>Consulting>Usability>Testing

153.
#34569

Fifteen Tips for Effective Usability Testing in India

An Introduction to Usability Testing and Tips for Effective Usability Testing in India. Created and presented by Abhay Rautela at Management Development Institute, Gurgaon, India at Bar Camp Delhi 6

Rautela, Abhay. Cone Trees (2009). Presentations>Usability>Testing>India

154.
#34685

Focus Groups vs. Usability Testing: What, When and Why?

Focus groups and usability testing are two very useful but very different user research disciplines. This article will look at the difference between focus groups and usability testing, the pros and cons of each and when in the development process you should use them.

Gray, Alistair. Webcredible (2009). Articles>Usability>Testing>Focus Groups

155.
#34875

Extremely Rapid Usability Testing   (peer-reviewed)

The trade show booth on the exhibit floor of a conference is traditionally used for company representatives to sell their products and services. However, the trade booth environment also creates an opportunity, for it can give the development team easy access to many varied participants for usability testing. The question is can we adapt usability testing methods to work in such an environment? Extremely rapid usability testing (ERUT) does just this, where we deploy a combination of questionnaires, interviews, storyboarding, co-discovery, and usability testing in a trade show booth environment. We illustrate ERUT in actual use during a busy photographic trade show. It proved effective for actively gathering real-world user feedback in a rapid paced environment where time is of the essence.

Pawson, Mark and Saul Greenberg. Journal of Usability Studies (2009). Articles>Usability>Testing>Methods

156.
#34938

Why "How Many Users" is Just the Wrong Question

Every day in offices around the world usability professionals ask and are asked this question: How many users do we need for our usability test? Its an important question. We want to find most of and the most severe problems. So, we need to test enough people. But usability testing is so expensive, and the cost of testing increases with each participant. So, we don't want to test too many, either.

Straub, Kathleen. UI Design Newsletter (2007). Articles>Usability>Testing>Methods

157.
#34943

Getting the Right Design and the Design Right: Testing Many Is Better Than One   (PDF)

We present a study comparing usability testing of a single interface versus three functionally equivalent but stylistically distinct designs. We found that when presented with a single design, users give significantly higher ratings and were more reluctant to criticize than when presented with the same design in a group of three. Our results imply that by presenting users with alternative design solutions, subjective ratings are less prone to inflation and give rise to more and stronger criticisms when appropriate. Contrary to our expectations, our results also suggest that usability testing by itself, even when multiple designs are presented, is not an effective vehicle for soliciting constructive suggestions about how to improve the design from end users. It is a means to identify problems, not provide solutions.

Tohidi, Maryam, William Buxton, Ronald Baecker and Abigail Sellen. CHI 2006 Proceedings (2006). Articles>Usability>Testing>Methods

158.
#34954

Usability Testing: A Reality Show?

In a typical on-camera usability test, in the lab environment, we ask the subjects to perform certain tasks using the product. Such tests are time-bound and follow strict procedures in terms of user profiling, briefing, task descriptions, actual performance and think aloud exercise, screen capturing (in case of software), etc. You do the video recording of usability test to observe the user performance, their response and behavior. All this is perfectly fine. Coming back to certain observations from the Big Boss reality show. I found that the participants of Big Boss have evolved through distinct psychological stages, which are sequentially progressive.

Katre, Dinesh S. Journal of HCI Vistas (2007). Articles>Usability>Testing

159.
#35237

Low-Budget Prototyping Techniques

We believe user research is too important to give up. So we have to run tests quickly and cheaply for our clients to accept the cost - and we have to clearly show how it brings value. Because of this, we’ve developed a toolbox of quick, cheap UX research techniques. In this article, we’ll talk about one technique known as fast prototyping, and how we effectively used it in a recent project for Vodafone Ireland.

Barros, Belén, Colin Bentley and Elizabeth McGuane. Johnny Holland (2009). Articles>Usability>Prototyping>Testing

160.
#35266

Six-Step Process for Planning a User Test

Preparing for usability testing requires a surprisingly large amount of planning. Here are the 6 key steps you should go through to get ready.

Warsi, Abid. Webcredible (2009). Articles>Usability>Testing>Methods

161.
#35308

Discount Usability: 20 Years

Simple user testing with 5 participants, paper prototyping, and heuristic evaluation offer a cheap, fast, and early focus on usability, as well as many rounds of iterative design.

Nielsen, Jakob. Alertbox (2009). Articles>Usability>Testing>Methods

162.
#35317

Moderating with Multiple Personalities: Three Roles for Facilitating Usability Tests

Usability tests are a core design tool and, when done well, they deliver tremendous insights to the team. However, when a usability test is done poorly, it can be a disaster for everyone involved. An important key to their success is the work of a great moderator.

Spool, Jared M. User Interface Engineering (2009). Articles>Usability>Testing>Methods

163.
#35352

Usability Testing Demystified

There seems to be this idea going around that usability testing is bad, or that the cool kids don’t do it. That it’s old skool. That designers don’t need to do it. What if I told you that usability testing is the hottest thing in experience design research? Every time a person has a great experience with a website, a web app, a gadget, or a service, it’s because a design team made excellent decisions about both design and implementation—decisions based on data about how people use designs. And how can you get that data? Usability testing.

Chisnell, Dana E. List Apart, A (2009). Articles>Usability>Testing>User Experience

164.
#35404

The Myth of Usability Testing

Usability evaluations are good for many things, but determining a team's priorities is not one of them. The Molich experiment proves a single usability team can't discover all or even most major problems on a site. But usability testing does have value as a shock treatment, trust builder, and part of a triangulation process. Test for the right reasons and achieve a positive outcome.

Hoekman, Robert, Jr. List Apart, A (2009). Articles>Usability>Testing

165.
#35446

Studying Web Pages Using Eye Tracking new!

Eye tracking has been investigated and 'toyed with' for many years by researchers and commercial usability professionals. Many new techniques and therefore interesting and powerful results are now available.

Ewing, Kirk. Scribd (2005). Articles>Usability>Testing>Eye Tracking

166.
#35447

The Hunt for Usability: Tracking Eye Movements new!

Incorporation of eye position recording into product usability evaluation can provide insights into human-computer interaction that are not available from traditional usability testing methods. We present here some thoughts on this topic which arose primarily from a CHI 99 workshop. This workshop brought together human-computer interaction designers, eye movement researchers and usability testing specialists for a discussion about how to extract information about product usability from users’ eye movements.

Karn, Keith S., Steve Ellis, and Cornell Juliano. SIGCHI Bulletin (2000). Articles>Usability>Testing>Eye Tracking

 
« PREVIOUS PAGE 

There are 15 readers currently online: 2 registered users and 13 guests. Register.Follow us on: TwitterFacebookRSSPost about us on: TwitterFacebookDeliciousRSSStumbleUpon