<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Rhetoric&gt;Theory</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Rhetoric/Theory</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Rhetoric and Theory in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Toward a Critical Perspective of Culture: Contrast or Compare Rhetorics</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/31782.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/31782.html</guid>
		<description>Kaplan&apos;s framework of contrastive rhetoric has been widely accepted in the field of cross-cultural technical communication. However, in the last four decades, contextual factors such as economic globalization trend and the advances of communication technologies are changing our ways of interacting with others. As a result our understanding of culture and cultural differences need to be adjusted. In this research, I start by recommending a workable definition of culture in the present context—culture as a process, which establishes a foundation for cross-cultural rhetorical research in the new era when communication across cultures transcends national boundaries. Based on the critical perspective of culture, I continue to point out the limitations of contrastive rhetoric and argue that contrastive rhetoric&apos;s view of culture and its research purpose and methodology need to be modified to overcome its constraints and better meet the needs of the present social context.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Institutionalizing English: Rhetoric on the Boundaries</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/31380.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/31380.html</guid>
		<description>Liberal historians tend to seek the disciplining of English in terms of the English department, as in Graff&apos;s account of people talking past each other while all finding shelter under the umbrella of a &quot;humanist myth.&quot;  While both these stories are useful (and in many ways, complementary), I want to examine disciplining of English into composition and literature by looking in relations English had with other disciplines, both within the new university, in that most defining feature of it,  he specialization of disciplinary activity, and, indirectly, beyond the new university, in various social practices with English and its neighboring those disciplines interacted.  Composition, I will argue, mediated those interactions in such a way that English was quite successful in its professionalization, but because composition was marginalized in crucial ways, its success was very limited.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Material Rhetorics and the Canon of Memoria: Rethinking the History (and Future) of Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/30732.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/30732.html</guid>
		<description>This presentation looks to the past to explain the present lack of attention given to memory and to imagine a possible future for the canon in contemporary rhetoric with the inclusion of the study of material rhetorics, or a comprehensive inquiry of situated things produced in cultural contexts that investigates both the material dimension in rhetoric and rhetorical dimension in the material. To this end, this essay summarizes noted reasons for memoria&apos;s limited study in contemporary rhetoric; revisits classic rhetoric&apos;s memoria and mines it for features worth recuperating for contemporary study; introduces material rhetoric and its potential to recuperate memoria in light of these features; and calls for further discussion of material rhetoric, the canon of memory, and the place of both in the study of rhetoric.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Influence of Burke and Lessing on the Semiotic Theory of Document Design: Ideologies and Good Visual Images of Documents</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29030.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29030.html</guid>
		<description>The syntactic aspect of semiotic theory, especially its &quot;aesthetic principle,&quot; is very influential in document design theories and practices. It has its roots in Burke&apos;s and Lessing s gender-related theories of images. Thus, it is laden with ideologies: it embodies our patriarchal attitudes and our iconophobia. Employing the semiotic theory in document design, we are making choices to reinforce the gender-related ideology in Burke&apos;s and Lessing&apos;s theories. It is time for us to re-conceive the &quot;aesthetic principle&quot; by de-emphasizing it and to adopt the reconciliation approach to design effective documents targeted at various rhetorical situations.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Spatial and Visual Rhetorics</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/26319.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/26319.html</guid>
		<description>Both spatial and visual rhetorics attend to issues of boundaries. From the structure of our classroom spaces to the margins of the page, rhetoric and compositionist are investigating the ways spatial and visual experiences are impacting our work as teachers and scholars.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cultural Differences in the Appreciation of Introductions of Presentations</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/25766.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/25766.html</guid>
		<description>On the basis of both established theories of the differences between cultures and recommendations in advice literature from different cultures, we believe that it is likely that cultures will differ in what they consider to be an effective introduction to a presentation. In this article, we report on an exploratory experimental study with 300 respondents in the Netherlands, France, and Senegal regarding their appreciation of and response to three introductions to a presentation about a mobile phone. The results show that the cultures differ with respect to the introduction they prefer. The Dutch respondents appreciated the overview most, while the French respondents preferred the ethical appeal, and research participants from Senegal preferred the anecdote. It is likely that the introduction that gains greatest attention and that best increases the ability to listen in a culture will be most appreciated in that culture.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodological Investigation</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/25684.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/25684.html</guid>
		<description>To try and explain everything means to explain nothing.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Selves, Subjects, and Agents: (Re)Positioning Agency with Self-Identity and Subjectivity</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/25322.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/25322.html</guid>
		<description>Through tracing some major historical influences and current theoretical perspectives of the human person, this article works toward providing both a foundation and rationale for a critical exploration of theories of agency, self-identity, and subjectivity. The first section traces the path of the Cartesian influence on current Western perceptions of the individual person, then reviews literature relevant to theories of self-identity, subjectivity, and agency within social construction, structuration theory, systems theory, and areas of cultural studies. Based upon these views of the human person, the second section examines agency as an under-theorized concept that requires further consideration (with self-identity and subjectivity) as a salient element of the person and theories of human identity in future research.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Seeing and Using Theories for Design</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/24098.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/24098.html</guid>
		<description>In recent years, the subject of research has attracted much attention within the field of design. In  this discussion, suggestion has been made about the importance of descriptive/explanatory theory for the practice of design. Given that design is prescriptive by nature, between description  and prescription, there is a gap. The gap suggests that the function and value of theory in design practice and thus its evaluation require further examination, clarification and demonstration. The  practical value of theory in scientific inquiry is unquestionable. Theory is often referred as the  foundation of sciences. Since the immediate goal of scientific practice is different from that of  design practice, can the same be said about theory for design? Taking a perspective of a  designer, my starting point is that theory, like any information, needs to be brought to life by our  way of seeing and using it. Through reflecting on how I have evaluated and used developmental  theories for a conceptual design of HIV prevention communication. I will bring up the issue of user  in theory evaluation, attempt to demonstrate theory is (made) useful (by)/to designing and put  into perspective the value of descriptive/explanatory theory to designing.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Modeling a New Rhetorical Architecture</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/23295.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/23295.html</guid>
		<description>Standard Generalized Markup Language&#xD;(SGML) and Hypertext Markup Language&#xD;(HTML) are based in document architectures.&#xD;They work in part because documents&#xD;can be defined by type. Yet that&#xD;basis in types gives us opportunity to free&#xD;information from those traditional types.&#xD;But this freedom imposes upon us a need to re-define our approaches to communication models.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Genre as Social Action</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/21976.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/21976.html</guid>
		<description>Although rhetorical criticism has recently provided a profusion of claims that certain discourses constitute a distinctive class, or genre, rhetorical theory has not provided firm guidance on what constitutes a genre.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Rhetoric of Decision Science, or Herbert A. Simon Says</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/21974.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/21974.html</guid>
		<description>The tools of decision science are widely used and accepted in industrial and governmental decision making. But...</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Talking with Virginia Postrel</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/21277.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/21277.html</guid>
		<description>Postrel&apos;s new book, The Substance of Style, explores the economic, cultural, social, personal, and political implications of the growing importance of aesthetics in business and society.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Text Models in the USA and The Netherlands</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/20131.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/20131.html</guid>
		<description>Text models are handy tools for planning or recognizing the global structure of a text. In this&#xD;paper we compare a few modern communication&#xD;handbooks in the USA and The Netherlands as to&#xD;their treatment of text models. The Dutch “vaste&#xD;structure” may contribute to the tool kit of&#xD;American technical writers. After that we present a&#xD;short discussion of the characteristics of ideal text&#xD;models and their ideal users. The first text model in&#xD;history, the classical &apos;partes orationis,&apos; and the&#xD;first text models for Environmental Impact&#xD;Statements from the 1970’s prove to possess a&#xD;series of deficiencies. We conclude our paper with&#xD;a proposed procedure for pretesting new text&#xD;models for new documents.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Activity Theory: A Versatile Framework for Workplace Research</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/19837.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/19837.html</guid>
		<description>During the past decade activity theory has attracted a small but influential group of researchers in two fields that contribute to theory and research in technical communication: human-computer interaction and&#xD;composition studies. In my STC-sponsored research into&#xD;electronic editing in technical communication, I am&#xD;applying activity theory to provide a coherent&#xD;explanatory perspective on the findings of the qualitative&#xD;portion of my study. This paper provides a brief&#xD;introduction to activity theory and applies its analytical&#xD;framework to help make sense of the qualitative data I&#xD;gathered on electronic editing practices and attitudes in&#xD;three different technical communication workplaces.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Are Shared Discourses Desirable?</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/19357.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/19357.html</guid>
		<description>Some kind of shared discourse is needed for the shared work of the academic community to continue; and even more so, this paper argues that the nation needs some kind of shared discourse in which to address the pressing problems that confront us all.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Rhetorical Theory Discussion Group</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/18960.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/18960.html</guid>
		<description>Open to teachers, students, practitioners, or the idly curious. Discussion of both pure theory and practical applications of theory are welcome. Topics include (but are not limited to):&#xD;&#xD;Technical communication, The Sophists, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle , Cicero, Quintilian, Augustine, Boethius, Christine de Pisan, Laura Cereta, Desiderius Erasmus, Peter Ramus, Francis Bacon, John Locke, George Campbell, Friedrich Nietzsche, Mikhail Bakhtin, I. A. Richards, Ernst Cassirer, Kenneth Burke, Richard Weaver, Chaim Perelman, Stephen Toulmin, Michel Foucalt, Jacques Derrida, Helene Cixous, Julia Kristeva, Kenneth A. Bruffee, Rachel Spilka, Thomas Kuhn, Carolyn Miller, Jakob Nielsen, Edward R. Tufte, Langdon Winner.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Authority in Hypertext</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/18951.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/18951.html</guid>
		<description>This is an alternative/modified title page for a web of documents focused on the issue of authority and exists as the result of my decision to include this site on authority in hypertext as part of another project. This page exists for several reasons: the passage of time, the nature of the WWW, and the fact that the authority web exists. I will briefly discuss each of these reasons.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Characterization of Quack Theories</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/18375.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/18375.html</guid>
		<description>In this article, I will first list some evidential flaws and then discuss errors in relating evidence to theory. Of necessity, this is a short list that omits most such problems. It is largely biased by what I have seen in newsgroup discussions.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Argumentation: An Overview of Theoretical Approaches and Research Themes</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/18317.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/18317.html</guid>
		<description>Argumentation is a phenomenon we are confronted with daily. We argue all the time for our own views and we react continually to oral or written argumentation put forward by others. Apart from being a verbal activity, argumentation is also a social activity directed at other people. On top of that, it is a rational activity aimed at defending a standpoint in such a way that it is acceptable to a reasonable judge. </description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>О Риторическом Контексте Проблемы Истины</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/18313.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/18313.html</guid>
		<description>Прежде всего, о чем мы ведем речь, говоря об истине? Не стоит ли договориться о различении &quot;истины&quot; и &quot;истинности&quot;. Обычно под истиной понимается любое истинное суждение. Сказать о некотором суждении, что оно истинно, или сказать, что данное суждение есть истина, не одно ли это и то же? Но это как раз тот случай, когда предположение синонимии свидетельствует о неполноте наших знаний о мире. Синонимия, предполагающая тождество смыслов, является насилием над живым языком и по отношению к естественному языку применима лишь в очевидно ограниченном смысле - как характеристика семантической близости слов. Тождество слов в живом языке такая же немыслимая вещь, как и тождество живых существ в природе.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Activity Theory</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/15074.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/15074.html</guid>
		<description>Activity theory was developed in the Soviet Union. The philosophical underpinnings of this theory include the ideas of Hegel and Kant, as well as the theory of dialectical materialism developed by Marx and Engels. The theory evolved from the work of Vygotsky as he formulated a new method of studying thought and consciousness. Vygotsky was working on this theory at a time when the prevalent dominant psychological theories were based on reflexology (stimulus-response - which was later developed into behaviorism) and psychoanalysis. Reflexology attempted to ban consciousness by reducing all psychological phenomena to a series of stimulus-response chains.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Activity Theory: Basic Concepts and Applications</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/15069.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/15069.html</guid>
		<description>This tutorial introduces participants to Activity Theory, a conceptual approach that provides a broad framework for describing the structure, development, and context of computer-supported activities. The tutorial will consist of lectures, discussion and small group exercises. A Web community will be established so attendees will be able to continue to learn about and use activity theory. </description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>An Introduction to Genre Theory</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/15070.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/15070.html</guid>
		<description>The word genre comes from the French (and originally Latin) word for &apos;kind&apos; or &apos;class&apos;. The term is widely used in rhetoric, literary theory, media theory, and more recently linguistics, to refer to a distinctive type of &apos;text&apos;*. Robert Allen notes that &apos;for most of its 2,000 years, genre study has been primarily nominological and typological in function. That is to say, it has taken as its principal task the division of the world of literature into types and the naming of those types - much as the botanist divides the realm of flora into varieties of plants. However, the analogy with biological classification into genus and species misleadingly suggests a &apos;scientific&apos; process. </description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Rethinking Genre in School and Society: An Activity Theory Analysis</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/15055.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/15055.html</guid>
		<description>This article attempts to expand and elaborate theories of social &apos;context&apos; and formal schooling, to understand the stakes involved in writing. It first sketches ways Russian activity theory in the tradition of A. N. Leont&apos;ev may expand Bakhtinian dialogism, then elaborates the theory in terms of North American genre research, with examples drawn from research on writing in the disciplines in higher education. By tracing the relations of disciplinary genre systems to educational genre systems, through the boundary of the classroom genre system, the analyst/reformer can construct a model of the interactions of classroom practices with wider social practices. Activity theory analysis of genre systems may offer a theoretical bridge between the sociology of education and Vygotskian social psychology of classroom interaction, and contribute toward resolving the knotty problem of the relation of macro- and microstructure in literacy research based on various social theories of &apos;context.&apos;</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Cubist Approach to Analyzing Interpretive Communities</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14909.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14909.html</guid>
		<description>Stanley Fish&apos;s theory of interpretive communities has been highly regarded for the past two decades. This paper deals with the idea of multiple interpretive communities as they relate to technical communicators. Technical communicators have a duty to use rhetorical devices and embedded structural cues to help readers identify the correct interpretive framework.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Persuasion In Technical Communication: Applying Symbolic Interactionism</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14508.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14508.html</guid>
		<description>Symbolic interactionism provides technical communicators&#xD;with a persuasive tool that facilitates effective communication.&#xD;By treating meaning as a socially negotiated and&#xD;negotiable product rather than apart of language, technical&#xD;communicators can more easily persuade readers to follow&#xD;instructions, to grant proposals, or to accept reports. By&#xD;taking the sources of meaning away from objects and away&#xD;from symbols per se, symbolic interaction empowers the&#xD;technical communicator with the means to effectively&#xD;communicate and persuade.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Institutional Critique: A Rhetorical Methodology for Change</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14463.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14463.html</guid>
		<description>We offer institutional critique as an activist methodology for changing institutions. Since institutions are rhetorical entities, rhetoric can be deployed to change them. In its effort to counter oppressive institutional structures, the field of rhetoric and com-position has focused its attention chiefly on the composition classroom, on the de-partment of English, and on disciplinary forms of critique. Our focus shifts the scene of action and argument to professional writing and to public discourse, using spatial methods adapted from postmodern geography and critical theory.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Understanding Metaphors for Writing: In Defense of the Conduit Metaphor</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14460.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14460.html</guid>
		<description>The Conduit Metaphor has been roundly condemned by language scholars, including scholars in rhetoric and composition, but it is time to reevaluate its import and value. Rather than simply asserting a mistaken view of linguistic communication, the Conduit Metaphor combines with the metaphor Language Is Power to form a prudentially applied ethical measure of discourses, genres, and texts. </description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Derridean Approach to Critical Reading: A MONSTER!</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14426.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14426.html</guid>
		<description>Hearing the term &apos;critical reading&apos; provokes my composition students to lemon-pucker grimace and nervously shift in their seats as if a monster had suddenly appeared. They often gasp at the prospects of the composition course&apos;s planned future critical reading unit. They identify with theorist Jacques Derrida&apos;s poststructural (deconstruction) notion that &apos;the future is necessarily monstrous: the figure of the future, that is, that which can only be surprising, that for which [they] are not prepared, you see, is heralded by a species of monsters&apos;. I do not try convincing students that texts are un-intimidating and that critical reading is an unthreatening process of merely examining specific dominant codes within texts that allow for predisposed meanings to occur. I rather tell students that texts are indeed monstrous and the process of critical reading is undeniably what Derrida terms &apos;a monster.&apos; Considering then that a monster rears its head in the composition classroom, it is necessary to learn one possible way students may approach the wide-ranging process of critical reading. In this brief article, I attempt to discuss Jacques Derrida&apos;s definition of the &apos;monster&apos; and how this definition may be applied to a practice of critically reading texts, appropriately expressed by the memorable acronym, &apos;A MONSTER.&apos;</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Language as Vision: The Ocularcentrism of Chomskyan Linguistics</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14423.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14423.html</guid>
		<description>References to vision pervade Chomsky’s work. They are a key component of the figures he uses, the examples he provides, the analogies he makes, and the argumentative warrants supporting his central claims.  When dealing with opponents Chomsky repeatedly exploits the rhetorical potential of visual analogies and metaphors in order to construct rebuttals.  References to vision and to spatio-visual phenomenon constitute a key component of the most characteristic rhetorical moves Chomsky makes, and are central to the way Chomsky defines the project of linguistics.  From Syntactic Structures to his most recently published texts, Chomsky’s writing is permeated by a constellation of terms centered on space, vision, optics and form.  This is perhaps not altogether surprising, given that Chomsky is a thinker who identifies so strongly with Descartes, and who describes his theoretical project as “Cartesian”.  In Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision David Levin argues that Descartes is the modern philosopher most obviously indebted to the metaphor of knowledge as spatio-visual, a writer whose work most clearly exemplifies a discourse that is dominated by an ocular metaphoric. While a range of figurative expressions characterize generative discourse, ocular metaphors are assigned a place of particular importance.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Basic Communication Theory</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14313.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14313.html</guid>
		<description>In the 1940&apos;s researchers at Bell Telephone Laboratories devised a model of the process of human communication. This model consists of numeous elements.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Anxiety In Action: Sullivan&apos;s Interpersonal Psychiatry as a Supplement to Vygotskian Psychology</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14071.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14071.html</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to deal with such psychiatric issues in a way that is consistent with the psychological theory of Vygotsky and his followers? Or do these issues represent a totally different subject matter belonging to the distinctive disciplines of psychiatry and clinical psychology, which use entirely different intellectual, investigative, and practical tools? Are Vygotskian approaches to being human in fact blind to major processes of human interpersonal development and to the consequences of that development for the social participation that Vygotsky identifies as the source of higher mental processes?</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Textual Performance: Where the Action at a Distance Is</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14070.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14070.html</guid>
		<description>Rhetoric&apos;s concern for individual sense making is expressed in such topics as the nature and role of enthymemes, the character and disposition of audiences, figures of thought, and the psychological underpinnings of arrangement. Persuasion, as a movement of the mind, depends on individual sense-making even though this dependency isn&apos;t always made explicit for analytic scrutiny. Rhetoric&apos;s attitude toward sense making is shaped by rhetoric&apos;s orgins in oral performance which leaves no artifact (except for the occasional script or transcription that Plato has so much fun with in the Phaedrus) but which confronts rhetors with embodied audiences whose minds they have to move, and audiences are confronted with embodied rhetors who appear to be thinking about one thing and then a moment later thinking about something else. The fleeting meaning held in the rhetor&apos;s mind communicated to the audience transfigure and unite them both for a moment, then soon dissipates as thought and attention turn to various elsewheres. Such is the flow of life noted by the sophists.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Affective Domain and the Writing Process: Working Definitions</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14054.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14054.html</guid>
		<description>Since the time of classical Greece, we have been accustomed to viewing humans as both thinking and feeling individuals. The dichotomy of cognition and affect is so ingrained in Western thought that it seems a natural one; the two elements have seldom, however, been deemed equally important in the scientific community. During the nineteenth century and early twentieth century, psychology gave primacy to affect; humans were thought to be at the mercy of various drives and passions. As behaviorism became more domiúnant in the field, affect was discounted; indeed, there were those who wished to exclude affect from scientific study altogether. More recently, with the ascendancy of cognitive psychology, humans have been viewed as problem-solvers whose thinking processes operate rather like a computer. Often in such a view, affect is seen as “a regrettable flaw in an otherwise perfect cognitive machine” (Scherer 293). But most researchers who study human behavior and human nature agree that the views of both extremes—emphasizing only affect or only cognition—are undesirable.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Genre and Identity: Citizenship in the Age of the Internet and the Age of Global Capitalism</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14052.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14052.html</guid>
		<description>One of the more popular academic slogans of this half century is Wittgenstein&apos;s characterization of language-in-use as a form of life. Genre theory takes this slogan seriously. In perceiving an utterance as being of a certain kind or genre, we become caught up in a form of life, joining speakers and hearers, writers and readers, in particular relations of a familiar and intelligible sort. As participants orient towards this communicative social space they take on the mood, attitude, and actional possibilities of that placeóthey go that place to do the kinds of things you do there, think the kinds of thoughts you think there, feel the kind of way you feel there, satisfy what you can satisfy there, be the kind of person you can become there (Bazerman 1997, 1998). It is like going to a dining room, or a dance hall, or a seminar, or church. You know what you are getting yourself into and what range of relations and objects will likely be realized there. You adopt a frame of mind, set your hopes, plan accordingly, and begin acting with that orientation.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Modern Rhetorical Theory</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14050.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14050.html</guid>
		<description>With special attention to the rhetor-audience relationship, the course studies history and practice of modern rhetorical theory. &#xD;&#xD;The main idea is that you learn the classical elements of rhetoric in some detail and then practice applying them to contemporary texts, whether they are the ones you are writing or analyzing. I think you should use this course so you can better understand not only rhetoric, but other areas of study that you are interested in, whether it be technology, popular culture, or a discipline outside of English. Make this course work for you.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Author&apos;s Voice and the Reader&apos;s Role:  An Analysis of Rhetorical Issues in How-to Texts</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/13728.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/13728.html</guid>
		<description>In mainstream computer applications such as Microsoft Word for Windows version 6.0, one will find a User&apos;s Guide included with the product. This User&apos;s Guide is a primary manual. It is included with the software application. A visit to any large bookstore will also reveal a large number of manuals about Word. Called secondary manuals, these manuals are not written by the same software development company that produced Word, nor are they included with Word. Both types of manuals are produced by technical writers and in many ways are similar in scope, content and cognitive strategies. However, in other respects some primary and secondary manuals are quite different, and that difference is the focus of this thesis.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Does Web Delivery Impact the Reader-Response Approach to Technical Communication?</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/13386.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/13386.html</guid>
		<description>This paper is an attempt to explore how reader-response criticism and the overall approach to using rhetoric in technical communication may be impacted by the large amount of technical documentation moving to the Web. The discussion focuses on three main areas: moving from the “reader” to the “user” in online documentation; the value of plain language style in this medium; and how Web delivery seems to be bridging the gap between user interface (UI) text and help documentation. I shall explore these areas in an attempt to clarify whether the publication of technical documentation on the Internet negates the rhetorical approach to technical communication and how or if Web delivery impacts the reader-response view that users play a significant role in creating the meaning of a text.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Interpretation Within Audience Analysis Theories and the Crusade for True Empiricism </title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/13384.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/13384.html</guid>
		<description>Audience analysis frameworks do not address an important aspect of communication in writer/audience relationships. This element is the humanistic aspect of cognitive processing, which encompasses emotional and cultural aspects. These elements exist on behalf of the writer as well as the reader, which without taking either into account lead us to a less than full understanding of how we can progress in our studies around this issue. We continue to study and theorize about how to improve interactions between writer and audience.  Although current theories seem to add considerations important in the audience analysis process and the writer/audience relationship, there remains a need to find ways to address the truly empirical aspects of human interpretation.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Rhetorical Shifts in Author/Audience Roles on the World-Wide Web</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/13385.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/13385.html</guid>
		<description>Audience analysis figures prominently into Technical Communication curricula because the focus of technical communication is to take complex technical information and create materials that can help readers use, learn, repair, or build equipment or systems (Alred et al. 2).  In order to help readers perform these specialized tasks, we must be intimately familiar with their real and anticipated needs, expectations, and limitations. Many different models of the author/audience relationship have been proposed to aid in this analysis.  These models have worked well (depending on what school of thought one subscribed to) when the main delivery system consisted of print media.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Role of Social Construction in Technical Communication</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/13383.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/13383.html</guid>
		<description>Technical communicators perform an important role in society, relaying complex messages in a clear and concise manner to people who would otherwise have to spend an inordinate amount of time tracking down this information for themselves. Among other things, technical communicators are responsible for writing software manuals and computer help systems, instruction manuals for everything from appliances to airplanes, and health-related pamphlets and warnings. If this information is misunderstood – either through the shortcomings of the writer or reader – the consequences can be devastating.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Study of Theories on Style in Technical Communication</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/13381.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/13381.html</guid>
		<description>One of the most frequent questions technical communicators encounter is what style they should write in. Unfortunately it is not an easy question. The answer to this question should come from careful theoretical studies and deliberate analysis of the audience and many other factors, such as social environment. In this paper, I wish to analyze theories, which guide the style in technical communication, from three angles: reader analysis, interpretive communities and whether technical communication is plain, instructional, or rhetorical. In the conclusion section, I will try to analyze the importance of extracting valuable parts from each theory and how the valid points from each theory work together to guide technical communicators to choose the right style in technical communication.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Rhetoric/Theory.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>