| |||||||||
|
51. #29077 The Passive Voice and Social Values in Science This article claims that two social values in science--falsifiability of science and cooperation among scientists--determine use of passives in scientific communication. Scientists do not always develop valid theories, so scientific experiments must be amenable to being repeated and found invalid. This requires that the experiments must not be discrete events. Science is also a cooperative enterprise. As an integral part of science, scientific writing employs more passives than actives to focus on materials, methods, figures, processes, tables, concepts, etc. Use of passives to focus on the physical world helps de-emphasize discreteness of scientific experiments. Besides, it also helps remove personal qualifications of observing experimental results. Finally, it enhances cooperation among working scientists by providing a common knowledge base of scientific work--things and objects. Looked at in this way, the passive voice in scientific writing represents professional practices of science instead of personal stylistic choices of individual scientists. Ding, Daniel D. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication (2002). Articles>Scientific Communication>Grammar>Minimalism 52. #30197 Passive Voice Is Redeemed For Web Headings Active voice is best for most Web content, but using passive voice can let you front-load important keywords in headings, blurbs, and lead sentences. This enhances scannability and thus SEO effectiveness. Nielsen, Jakob. Alertbox (2007). Articles>Web Design>Writing>Grammar 53. #27331 Place strong words at the beginning of sentences and paragraphs, and at the end. The period acts as a stop sign. Any word next to the period says, 'Look at me.' Clark, Roy Peter. Poynter Online (2004). Articles>Writing>Grammar>Rhetoric 54. #26173 Not too long ago, I was managing a translation project in Access (English to Greek) when I discovered that the translator hadn't used question marks similar to those used in the English source. Instead of question marks, he was using semicolons. I was sure that this was a mistake and that the computer was acting strange again. But it wasn't a mistake. In the Greek language, the question mark is like a semicolon, and the semicolon is instead a raised period. I've started to check on other projects as well, and I've learned quite a few interesting things about punctuation and their separators. Bratu, Felicia. WTB Language Group (2005). Articles>Language>Localization>Grammar 55. #26276 Punctuation, Punctuation, Punctuation A light touch with punctuation has always made sense, whether you're scratching out a sonnet on velum with a quill pen, or texting a mate on your mobile. It's meant to enhance communication, not hinder it. Caborn, Anne. Creative Latitude (2005). Articles>Writing>Grammar 56. #24162 Reconsidering Some Prescriptive Rules of Grammar and Composition Technical writers and editors are beset with rules. As authoritative as they are, published style guides such as The Chicago manual of style, MLA, APA, and Gregg do not address reading theory but hang their prescriptions on the flimsy mantle of tradition. This article challenges some putative rules of grammar and mechanics in an effort to improve technical texts for the people who read them. Connatser, Bradford R. Technical Communication Online (2004). Articles>Style Guides>Grammar 57. #30690 Review: Rhetorical Grammar, 5th Edition Throughout the book, Kolln works to build the readers' confidence and encourage them to think of grammar as a tool. Rhetorical Grammar is a textbook for undergraduate students, and Kolln keeps this target audience in mind by making the 322- page book user-friendly. Tutt, Bryan. Business Communication Quarterly (2007). Articles>Reviews>Grammar>Rhetoric 58. #29684 Sentence Diagramming: Making Sense of Sentences Sentence diagramming is an important tool for technical communicators to use in analyzing their own writing and editing. Sentence diagramming is also a neutral basis from which to discuss and evaluate technical documentation with colleagues and with other co- workers, such as subject-matter experts, who are not professional communicators. Through visual examples, this paper illustrates how to diagram three types of sentences (simple, compound, and complex), how sentence diagramming shows an objective view of three common syntactical errors (misplaced modifier, lack of parallel structure, and dangling modifier), and how the revised sentences make sense as sentences and as diagrams. Ball, Valerie M. STC Proceedings (2005). Articles>Editing>Grammar 59. #26067 Sentence Types and Sentence Structures Revisited Before we discuss sentence types and structures, let us regard writing as a donut. When talking of sentence types, we will consider four building blocks of the donut. Gururaj, B.S. and N.R. Prabhat. Indus (2005). Articles>Writing>Grammar 60. #29886 Some Thoughts on Teaching Grammar to Improve Writing The conviction that writing can be improved with a knowledge of grammar has prevailed for quite a long time. But research has shown no correlation between grammatical knowledge and writing ability. Baum, Bernard. CCC (1967). Articles>Education>Writing>Grammar 61. #28165 Thomas Mann described the writer as somebody for whom writing is more difficult than it is for other people. Nowhere is this truer than for comma use: while most folks float along blithely putting commas in or leaving them out at whim, we agonize over every squiggle. Why? Because we understand that the presence or absence of a comma can change the meaning of a sentence. In our line of work, unclear sentences can have dire consequences for our readers. So we worry. Wenger, Andrea. Carolina Communique (2005). Articles>Writing>Grammar 62. #22131 Stressing What is Important in a Sentence In addition to expunging the usual collection of wordy phrases from documents, editors commonly attempt to tighten up writing to make it more direct, clear, and concise. For example, when editing business and technical material, I frequently change sentences containing 'it is,' 'there is,' and 'there are.' Writers often ask me 'what was wrong with that sentence?' I reply that although the sentence wasn't wrong grammatically, such phrases distract the reader from the important part of the message. Hollis Weber, Jean. Technical Editors Eyrie (2002). Articles>Writing>Grammar 63. #23726 Information on style, grammar, and usage. Technical Communicators Resource Site. Reference>Style Guides>Grammar 64. #21534 A collection of online resources about style guides and reference sites about grammar. 65. #15202 Teaching a Workshop on Sentence Diagramming Demonstrates how sentence diagramming can be an effective writing tool and offers tips on how it should be taught. Jennings, Ann S. Intercom (2002). Articles>Education>Editing>Grammar 66. #26615 Tech Writers, Grammar, and the Prescriptive Attitude Many tech writers do not see grammar as a set of conventions to help them write clearly. Instead, to judge by the wording of the questions and responses, they see grammar as a set of unchanging rules that can provide definitive answers in every situation. Byfield, Bruce. TECHWR-L. Articles>Language>Grammar>Technical Writing 67. #29382 Ten Grammar Mistakes That Make You Look Stupid These days, we tend to communicate via the keyboard as much as we do verbally. In general, we can slip up in a verbal conversation and get away with it. A colleague may be thinking, Did she just say 'irregardless'?, but the words flow on, and our worst transgressions are carried away and, with luck, forgotten. That's not the case with written communications. When we commit a grammatical crime in e-mails, discussion posts, reports, memos, and other professional documents, there's no going back. Catching typos is easy (although not everyone does it). It's the other stuff -- correctly spelled but incorrectly wielded -- that sneaks through and makes us look stupid. Here's a quick review of some of the big ones. TechRepublic (2005). Articles>Business Communication>Grammar 68. #22688 Ten More Errors in Technical Writing So, well, here are 10 more errors. This time we will focus on grammar and punctuation. Most of these are simplistic and obvious. But then they are too common. As usual, I have slipped in some content for the advanced writers too. (This article is a follow-up to 'One Hundred Simple Tech Writing Errors .) Kamath, Gurudutt R. IT People (2003). Articles>Editing>Grammar>Technical Writing 69. #30266 To Err is Human, But Can It Be Forgiven?: Effects and Economics of Typos Technical communicators dread typos. A piece of work that contains one or more typos is seen as shoddy, not something to be proud of. Finding and correcting these errors, however, takes time and costs money. Might there be a better way to spend resources?- ways that might produce more usable information.? Effects of errors, value added by correcting them, and the economics of error detection will be discussed. Grice, Roger A., Lenore S. Ridgway Richard K. Ridgway and Edward J. See. STC Proceedings (1995). Articles>Editing>Grammar 70. #29011 "Unattached" Clauses in Technical Writing The views concerning "dangling participles" of grammarians, usage experts and authors of books on technical writing are reviewed and compared. Although many unattached clauses are clearly unacceptable, some are less objectionable and still others are acceptable practice. Absolute constructions and other clause-relational participial, infinitival and verbless clauses need no attachment to a proximate noun or noun phrase, and logical clauses that are not attached to a noun are shown as normal, acceptable use. Even clearly adjectival clauses are often unattached when followed by the passive voice, intransitives and several other grammatical structures; clauses between the subject and verb and at the end of the sentence are also often not attached to the immediately preceding noun. Cultural (perhaps also gender) differences between humanistic teachers and task-oriented engineers are noted as possible causes of different viewpoints regarding the use of unattached participles, and greater acceptance of the many acceptable forms of unattached clauses is argued. <em>Suggested Reading Approach</em> The first three sections (on principles, authoritative views and theoretical background) could be skimmed if you are already familiar with the background. Jordan, Michael P. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication (1999). Articles>Writing>Grammar>Technical Writing 71. #23407 The question to the list-subscribers was I am looking for studies dealing with the difference between small letters and capitals. Are small letters easier to read? In France, road signs are written in capitals but it is not the case in the US or Canada. Gaviero-Villatte, Elisa. TC-FORUM (2000). Articles>Style Guides>Grammar 72. #22134 This page collects a series of notes from readers of my newsletter, and my responses to those notes, arising from an article in issue 60, 13 May 2002. I thank those who took the time to write and explain why some hyphen usage is considered to be correct or incorrect. Hollis Weber, Jean. Technical Editors Eyrie (2002). Articles>Writing>Style Guides>Grammar 73. #28167 The Wicked Which and Other Fairytales Popular culture is filled with myths about grammar. Taught by generations of English teachers, these stories admonish little children to cling to the straight and narrow path, rather than venturing into the woods of creative communication. Some of these stories are usage guidelines rather than rules, but others are pure fantasy, the flight of some pedagogue's imagination. Wenger, Andrea. Carolina Communique (2005). Articles>Writing>Grammar 74. #23168 A slideshow that presents some often-confused elements of English grammar. Gururaj, B.S. STC India (2003). Presentations>Writing>Grammar 75. #28169 When you scan job postings for technical communicators, you'll find prospective employers seeking candidates who have an understanding of current technology, working knowledge of publishing tools, and time management skills. A bullet may ask for 'excellent writing and editing skills,' but that bullet rarely appears at the top of the list. Not for me. Harvey, Michael. Carolina Communique (2005). Articles>Writing>Grammar
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
Click here to learn how to embed the RSS feed of this category in your website.