<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Design&gt;Web Design&gt;Usability&gt;Eye Tracking</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Design/Web-Design/Usability/Eye-Tracking</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Design and Web Design and Usability and Eye Tracking in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>When It Comes to Homepages, It is Polite to Stare</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/33229.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/33229.html</guid>
		<description>That one webpage bears all the promotional burdens that would typically be spread through an entire printed edition of your newspaper. Your homepage begins to look as though a dozen designers from different departments each built their own piece.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Using Eye Tracking to Compare Web Page Designs: A Case Study</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/33235.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/33235.html</guid>
		<description>A proposed design for the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Web site was evaluated against the original design in terms of the ease with which the right starting points for key tasks were located and processed. This report focuses on the eye tracking methodology that accompanied other conventional usability practices used in the evaluation. Twelve ASCO members were asked to complete several search tasks using each design. Performance measures such as click accuracy and time on task were supplemented with eye movements which allowed for an assessment of the processes that led to both the failures and the successes. The report details three task examples in which eye tracking helped diagnose errors and identify the better of the two designs (and the reasons for its superiority) when both were equally highly successful. Advantages and limitations of the application of eye tracking to design comparison are also discussed.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Eye Movement Patterns on Single and Dual-Column Web Pages</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/32803.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/32803.html</guid>
		<description>This study examines eye movement patterns of users browsing or searching a 1-column and 2-column news article on a web page. The results show a higher number of fixations for information in the second column of an article than for the same information in the lower portion of a single column. In addition, the typical &quot;F&quot; pattern appeared in the left column of the 2-column layout, but not in the right column. Users also fixated more on other page elements, such as ads, when they were browsing than when they were searching.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How Do Users Browse a Portal Website? An Examination of User Eye Movements</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/32806.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/32806.html</guid>
		<description>This study examined the eye movement patterns of users browsing a web-based portal interface. Results demonstrate consistent scan patterns in both 2 and 3-column portal layouts. In the 2-column portal, users viewed the page through the top, left channel and proceeded to scan the rest of the portal page in a reverse &apos;S&apos; pattern by row. In the 3-column portal layout, users typically started scanning in the top, center channel, and then proceeded to scan in a reverse &apos;S&apos; pattern through the rest of channels by row. Implications of these results to portal design are discussed.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Using Eye Tracking to Compare Web Page Designs: A Case Study</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/28015.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/28015.html</guid>
		<description>A proposed design for the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Web site was evaluated against the original design in terms of the ease with which the right starting points for key tasks were located and processed. This report focuses on the eye tracking methodology that accompanied other conventional usability practices used in the evaluation. Twelve ASCO members were asked to complete several search tasks using each design. Performance measures such as click accuracy and time on task were supplemented with eye movements which allowed for an assessment of the processes that led to both the failures and the successes. The report details three task examples in which eye tracking helped diagnose errors and identify the better of the two designs (and the reasons for its superiority) when both were equally highly successful. Advantages and limitations of the application of eye tracking to design comparison are also discussed.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Eyetools, Enquiro, and Did-it uncover Search&apos;s Golden Triangle</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/27597.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/27597.html</guid>
		<description>The vast majority of eye tracking activity during a search happens in a triangle at the top of the search results page indicating that the areas of maximum interest create a &apos;golden triangle.&apos;</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Using Eye-Tracking Data to Understand First Impressions of a Website</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/27541.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/27541.html</guid>
		<description>This study discusses the contributions of eye-tracking data to traditional usability test measures for first-time usage of websites. Participants viewed the homepages of three different websites. Results showed that eye-movement data supplemented what users verbally reported in their reactions to a site. In particular, the eye-tracking data revealed which aspects of the website received more visual attention and in what order they were viewed.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>F-Shaped Pattern For Reading Web Content</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/27167.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/27167.html</guid>
		<description>Eyetracking visualizations show that users often read Web pages in an F-shaped pattern: two horizontal stripes followed by a vertical stripe.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Evaluating the Usability of Search Forms Using Eyetracking: A Practical Approach</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/27011.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/27011.html</guid>
		<description>The usability of forms is often massively important to the overall usability of a Web site. That&apos;s why we decided to subject some of these forms to a quick round of eyetracking tests and have analyzed the resulting data to better understand what makes Web forms usable--or unusable.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Testing Web Sites with Eye-Tracking</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/10569.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/10569.html</guid>
		<description>Thanks to some recent usability studies we conducted using an eye-tracking system, we now have real evidence of where users actually look when they view a web page. It’s clear that users quickly learn to look where they expect to find content. They also quickly learn to avoid areas where they don’t see—or expect—what they’re looking for, including banner ads and parts of the page outside the central area.  </description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Design/Web-Design/Usability/Eye-Tracking.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>