<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Design&gt;Web Design&gt;Accessibility&gt;HTML</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Design/Web-Design/Accessibility/HTML</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Design and Web Design and Accessibility and HTML in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>HTML 5 and Accessibility</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/35388.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/35388.html</guid>
		<description>Probably the most worrying thing about the HTML Working Group is the lack of respect for differing opinions that some working group members have. The apparent disinterest in accessibility is another troublesome factor.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>HTML 5, Microformats and Testing Accessibility</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/35389.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/35389.html</guid>
		<description>Testing is vital, particularly at the border of accessibility theory and practice. I wonder, for example, if tabindex and accesskey would have made it to the HTML4 spec if there had been full testing with assistive technology users? What I really want to know from the HTML5 people is who they think is going to do this research that will provide the evidence that their gang requires before useful attributes are restored to the specification.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>HTML 5 and the Summary Attribute</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/35392.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/35392.html</guid>
		<description>As I wrote in Help screen reader users by giving data tables a summary, the summary attribute on the table element can be used to provide information that helps non-sighted users understand data tables. The current draft of HTML 5 requires that validators display a warning if they encounter a summary attribute, since it is now an &apos;obsolete but conforming feature.&apos;</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Can the alt Attribute Be Omitted Without Hurting Accessibility?</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/32469.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/32469.html</guid>
		<description>In the current editor’s draft of the HTML 5 specification, the alt attribute for images is no longer required. I am not convinced that this is a good idea.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Accessible Tables</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/26648.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/26648.html</guid>
		<description>There is no question that the vast majority of tables on the Web are layout tables, used to structure the visual appearance of the page. Often the structure of tables is remarkably complex, with tables nested in tables as much as seven deep.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Design/Web-Design/Accessibility/HTML.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>