| |||||||||
|
51. #27455 The Resource Library aims to provide a single comprehensive collection of content management related information. Content Management Professionals. Resources>Directories>Content Management 52. #27992 A state-of-the-art knowledge base with a user-controlled faceted classification scheme. Most web directories (DMOZ ODP, Google, Yahoo) hard wire their category hierarchy. Here you can select the facet you want at the top of the hierarchy, then another facet for the next layer in the hierarchy, etc. A do-it-yourself taxonomy of content management systems. Doyle, Bob. CMS Review (2003). Resources>Directories>Content Management 53. #27375 This site is provided as a community service to everyone interested in looking for a means to manage web site content. Here you can discuss, rate, and compare the various systems available on the market today. CMS Matrix. Resources>Content Management>Software>Assessment 54. #22443 CMS Wiki is a knowledge base for Content Management. CMS Wiki. Resources>Content Management>Information Design>Wikis 55. #22779 El portal de referencia en español sobre el Enterprise Content Management y el Business Intelligence. CMS-Spain. (Spanish) Resources>Directories>Content Management 56. #21791 CMSWatch.com provides information, trends, opinion, and analysis about Web Content Management (WCM) solutions. The site also includes information and commentary about related technologies, such as XML, digital asset management, and content syndication. 57. #25745 CMSwire is a web magazine dedicated to all things content management. 58. #20314 Collaborating with Tools for Single-Sourcing A discussion of single-sourcing using FrameMaker and WebWorks Publisher. Bhatia, Neeraj and Frederick Menezes. STC India (2001). Articles>Content Management>Single Sourcing>Adobe FrameMaker 59. #25827 Collaborative Content Management However content is often created by authors working in isolation from other authors within the organization. Walls are erected among content areas and even within content areas, which leads to content being created, and recreated, and recreated, often with changes or differences at each iteration. This results in inconsistent information, duplication of effort, and increased costs. Rockley, Ann and David Coleman. Collaborative Strategies (2003). Articles>Content Management 60. #24999 Collaborative Document Editing with svk Say you have a document that needs to be presented in two languages and you are the translator. While the translation is in progress, someone revises the original master document. This means you now might be working with an outdated paragraph or one no longer present in the master version. This article tries to map this problem to parallel development, which version control systems solve with the branch and merge model. You will also see how svk helps you maintain translated documents easily. Kao, Chia-liang. O'Reilly and Associates (2004). Articles>Content Management>Collaboration>Writing 61. #20508 Streamline your review process with the robust collaboration tool set in Adobe® InCopy™ 2.0. With InCopy, you can track changed text, and add notes and comments without disturbing line breaks. Later, others on the team can easily identify who. Adobe (2003). Articles>Content Management>Single Sourcing>Adobe GoLive 62. #27130 Comparing Apples and Oranges to CMS Software As ridiculous as that may sound many are getting away with doing it. There are many comparisons of open source CMS software that are popping up that are total garbage. The reviewers are comparing CMS systems that are in 5 to 8 different categories and have 4 different sets of requirements. No wonder they are confused and can't make a choice. Hiveminds (2006). Articles>Content Management>Software 63. #25976 Component Content Management in Practice This white paper looks at the requirements of component content management in some industries and vertical markets. It compares the requirements of component content management with the capabilities of more general content management technologies, notably web content management and document management. It then looks at the technology behind CCMS in depth, and concludes with example applications where CCMS can have the most impact on an enterprise. Trippe, Bill. Gilbane Report (2004). Articles>Content Management 64. #14231 A Computing Research Repository: Why Not Solve the Problems First? The Computing Research Repository (CoRR) described by Halpern is potentially a powerful tool for researchers in computing science. In its current form, however, shortcomings exist that restrict its value and that, in the long term, might strongly undermine its usefulness. Important aspects that have insufficiently been taken care of are (1) the quality and consequently the reliability of the material stored, (2) the still restricted submission of material,which implies that other sources have to be consulted by researchers as well, (3) the still unsound financial basis of the project, and (4) the confusion that may easily arise when a preliminary version is stored in the CoRR, while a different final version is published in a journal. van Loon, A.J. Journal of Computer Documentation (2000). Articles>Content Management>Online 65. #28154 In the same way that the word 'truthiness' is not a real word but is gaining usage in our culture, so the word 'connectfulness' offers us in the professional arena a way to express an important aspect of our work. Just as truthiness says more than accuracy and is friendlier than truthfulness, so connectfulness says more than networked and is friendlier and more inclusive than connectedness. Albing, Bill. Carolina Communique (2006). Articles>Content Management>Collaboration 66. #26497 Considering Open Source Content Management Systems Open source software content management systems (CMS) offer affordability, flexibility, and in many cases outstanding performance. Still, Brian. IEEE PCS (2005). Articles>Content Management>Open Source 67. #19150 A Consumer Survey of CMS Vendor Websites In March 2003, an online survey was conducted of consumer opinion about CMS vendor websites. This was extensively promoted through the CMS mailing lists, and on key CMS websites such as CMS Watch, the Intranet Focus and Step Two Designs sites. In total, 168 responses were made to this survey, representing consumers from across the globe, and in every type of organisation. This briefing provides a high-level summary of the results of the survey. Robertson, James. Step Two (2003). Design>Content Management>Web Design 68. #28931 Many Web professionals consider content inventories critical parts of most projects. Are there certain specific things to look for during a content inventory? Fred Leise definitely thinks so. He proposes a set of content analysis heuristics and discusses how to utilize each one. Leise, Fred. Boxes and Arrows (2007). Articles>Content Management>Taxonomy>Heuristic Evaluation 69. #26968 Con il termine Content management si indica una serie di processi e tecnologie a supporto del ciclo di vita evolutivo dell'informazione digitale (content o digital content). 70. #22762 Not Document Management, which is a related function often accompanying CM but not necessarily a part of it. Document Management, the storage and retrieval of documents, is a category on this page as a matter of convenience. Content Management is the aggregating, managing, and disseminating of 'Content.' Publishing, replicating, and sharing content in different formats, managing workflow, authorizations and defining content elements. 71. #30646 Content management, or CM, is a set of processes and technologies that support the evolutionary life cycle of digital information. This digital information is often referred to ascontent or, to be precise, digital content. 72. #22441 Content Management and Information Architecture Content management is information architecture writ large. Boiko, Bob. ASIST (2001). Presentations>Content Management>Information Design 73. #22622 Content Management and the Electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) The XML eCTD DTD (Document Type Definition) defines the overall structure of the submission. The purpose of the XML backbone is two-fold: (1) to manage meta-data for the entire submission and each document within the submission and (2) to constitute a comprehensive table of contents and provide corresponding navigation aids. Rockley, Ann. Rockley Group, The (2004). Articles>Content Management>Standards>XML 74. #28563 Content Management and the Need for Change in Technical Communication Many technical communicators find it difficult to manage all of the corporate content that their organizations create. Learn how CM can work for you by providing value to your organization as well as your customers and shareholders. Abel, Scott. Intercom (2007). Articles>Content Management>Project Management 75. #22360 Review: Content Management for Dynamic Web Delivery One comes away from the book with a feeling of an enormous challenge—technical, organizational, budgetary, and political. If you or your boss is considering developing and deploying a content management system at your place of work and you both want to know what you might be in for, get this book. Hudak-David, Ginny. Technical Communication Online (2003). Articles>Reviews>Content Management>Adaptive
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
Click here to learn how to embed the RSS feed of this category in your website.