<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Word Processing&gt;User Interface&gt;Microsoft Word</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Word-Processing/User-Interface/Microsoft-Word</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Word Processing and User Interface and Microsoft Word in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Actual Readers Versus Implied Readers: Role Conflicts in Office 97</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/10405.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/10405.html</guid>
		<description>This article uses reader role theory to explain the dramatic failure of Paper-clip, the interface to Office 97&apos;s online help system. Called an Office Assistant, it is designed to shield users from the complexities of the software. Problems with Paper-clip surfaced as soon as Office 97 was launched. This article explains the Paper-clip controversy in terms of reader role conflicts by showing why actual readers rejected Paper-clip&apos;s role as implied writer and why they rebelled against the reader role Paper-clip implied for them. </description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Word-Processing/User-Interface/Microsoft-Word.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>