<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Web Design&gt;Privacy</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Web-Design/Privacy</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Web Design and Privacy in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Anonymous Cowards, Avatars, and the Zeitgeist: Personal Identity in Flux: Part I</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/35647.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/35647.html</guid>
		<description>Governments and large organizations, with legal and administrative concerns like taxation and security typically address the practical aspects of identity we experience on a daily basis—issuing IDs and credentials and deciding the mechanisms for their verification. This division of responsibilities for defining and executing the construct of personal identity is nearly as old as the mind/body schism at the heart of Western culture.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Online Privacy as Legal Safeguard: The Relationship Among Consumer, Online Portal, and Privacy Policies</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/32287.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/32287.html</guid>
		<description>Several surveys attest to growing public concerns regarding privacy, aggravated by the diffusion of information technologies. A policy of self-regulation that allows individual companies to implement self-designed privacy statements is prevalent in the United States. These statements rarely provide specific privacy guarantees that personal information will be kept confidential. This study provides a discourse analysis of such privacy statements to determine their overall efficacy as a policy measure. The in-depth analysis of privacy statements revealed that they offer little protection to the consumer, instead serving to authorize business practices which allow companies to profit from consumer data. Using public good theory as a foundation, policy implications are discussed.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Facebook&apos;s Privacy Trainwreck: Exposure, Invasion, and Social Convergence</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/32026.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/32026.html</guid>
		<description>Not all Facebook users appreciated the September 2006 launch of the `News Feeds&apos; feature. Concerned about privacy implications, thousands of users vocalized their discontent through the site itself, forcing the company to implement privacy tools. This essay examines the privacy concerns voiced following these events. Because the data made easily visible were already accessible with effort, what disturbed people was primarily the sense of exposure and invasion. In essence, the `privacy trainwreck&apos; that people experienced was the cost of social convergence.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Privacy Means Never Having to Say You&apos;re Sorry</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29442.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29442.html</guid>
		<description>For those of us who work with computers, the value of identifying ourselves to Web sites is increasingly obvious: no more retyping our name and address information, less need to memorize dozens of log-in passwords and paths to specific Web pages, less spam, and fewer irrelevant banner ads. But even those of us who appreciate the value of sharing some personal information with Web sites and those who run them are growing increasingly uncomfortable with the potential for abuse inherent in having information on our identities and preferences broadly available.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Guiding Principles for Providing &quot;Remember Me&quot; Personalization</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/28009.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/28009.html</guid>
		<description>As we set out to enhance personalization on Marriott.com, we realized we needed guidelines to inform our thinking and shape our decisions, particularly decisions related to customer privacy. Our earlier user research revealed the need for greater personalization and helped us understand customer attitudes towards privacy. From there, we sought to build customer trust and loyalty by addressing concerns about privacy and security in every aspect of the user experience. In creating the Guiding Principles outlined here, we conducted a thorough analysis of eight major websites and then merged the findings with what we already knew. These principles apply specifically to &apos;remember me&apos; personalization.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A to Z(ee) with P3P</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/26320.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/26320.html</guid>
		<description>When you build websites that rely on cookies and they are expected to work with privacy settings other than default, you’ll have to deal with P3P. Read on to find out about the cornerstones of the Platform for Privacy Preferences, and get your hands dirty with an example guiding you from empty hands to a complete basic implementation.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cookies: Just a Little Data Snack</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/24019.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/24019.html</guid>
		<description>To read the New York Times Web site, you must open a free user account and log in each time you visit. That means yet another user name and password to remember. Fortunately, if you always use the same computer, you can set up your account so that you&apos;re logged in automatically whenever you connect to the site. The site does that by using cookies  -- another of those silly-sounding bits of programmers&apos; vocabulary that have crept into mainstream coverage of the Internet. But over the past year or so, this practice has become controversial because some people view it as an invasion of privacy. Others have bought into rumors or read inaccurate press reports suggesting that cookies threaten the security of their hard drives.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Users Charter</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/19310.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/19310.html</guid>
		<description> The following is an attempt to outline a charter of rights for the user of web applications. They are, of course, unenforceable but compliance with them would represent best practice in the design of user-centred interfaces.&#xD;&#xD;More significantly, any violation of the charter would indicate the presence of significant usability problems detrimental to the user experience. And failing to address the requirements of the user leads to frustration, irritation and consequently lost business. </description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Web-Design/Privacy.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>