<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Usability&gt;Government</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Usability/Government</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Usability and Government in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Ballot Design and Usability</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/31993.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/31993.html</guid>
		<description>Discusses the importance of usability testing as a final check on ballot layout and instructions text. Many of the problems in the report would likely have been caught with even an informal test. The report highlights a usability testing kit for local election officials, the LEO Usability Testing Kit.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Teaching Election Officials Usability Testing</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/31994.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/31994.html</guid>
		<description>The election calendar is very tight, with legally mandated deadlines and other constraints, all conducted in the public view. The UPA Voting and Usability Project wanted a way to fit usability testing into that schedule, and give election officials a way to do what they all want: run excellent elections.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Working to Improve the Civic Experience</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/31632.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/31632.html</guid>
		<description>What has UPA done to encourage more useable and accessible government? Quite a lot, it turns out. UPA supports efforts to improve the usability of elections, support plain language, and remove barriers to civic access for people with disabilities through an alphabet soup of projects and events.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>User Research of a Voting Machine: Preliminary Findings and Experiences</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29453.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29453.html</guid>
		<description>This paper describes a usability study of the Nedap voting machine in the Netherlands. On the day of the national elections, 566 voters participated in our study immediately after having cast their real vote. The research focused on the correspondence between voter intents and voting results, distinguishing between usability (correspondence between voter intents and voter input) and machine reliability (correspondence between voter input and machine output). For the sake of comparison, participants also cast their votes using a paper ballot.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Voting and Usability Projects: How You can Participate</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/24738.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/24738.html</guid>
		<description>The UPA Voting and Usability project works to create a better elections process by improving the usability of ballots and voting systems.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Lessons Learned from Discount Usability Engineering for the Federal Government</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/23719.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/23719.html</guid>
		<description>This case study presents lessons learned from usability engineering in a federal government setting. Technical&#xD;communicators are becoming increasingly involved in&#xD;usability issues but may face difficulties in addressing&#xD;them. For example, producing web communications for&#xD;the federal government presents special challenges, such&#xD;as time and financial restraints, legal requirements,&#xD;technical constraints, and an internal focus. Discount&#xD;usability engineering helped the CDC address these&#xD;challenges in developing an injury data web application.&#xD;The lessons learned can help technical communicators&#xD;advance usability as a priority in their workplaces and&#xD;overcome constraints and challenges they face.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Lessons Learned from Discount Usability Engineering for the U.S. Federal Government</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/19513.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/19513.html</guid>
		<description>Presents a case history of implementing discount usability engineering in a U.S. federal government agency. Discusses the case history&apos;s implications for technical communicators who must implement Web communications in a restricted environment.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Usability/Government.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>