<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Technology&gt;Risk Communication</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Technology/Risk-Communication</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Technology and Risk Communication in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Risk Communication and Public Perception of Technological Hazards (Part One)</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/34395.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/34395.html</guid>
		<description>Research on risk communication relates basic risk perception studies to the formulation of policies, the currently evolving legislation dealing with hazards, the key issues of public involvement, the risk and environmental management. Risk communication is a relatively new field based on a sociological approach. The discipline comes from risk perception studies (psychological approach), which try to investigate how the public is influenced by certain variables in perceiving risk as &quot;acceptable&quot; or not. Risk communication involves some aspects of risk analysis methodology, since it results that also the technical analysis is influenced by the co-operation between the actors involved.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Consideration of the Report of the &lt;i&gt;Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident&lt;/i&gt; as Apologia</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/19132.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/19132.html</guid>
		<description>The Rogers report seems to be more than just a report to explain the Challenger accident and give suggestions to avoid a similar tragedy occurring in the future. In a sense, it appears to be a type of apologia.&#xD;&#xD;On January 28, 1986 the Space Shuttle Challenger, mission 51-L, launched from Florida&apos;s Kennedy Air force Base at 11:38 a.m. Eastern Stand ard Time. As the country watched in disbelief, the shuttle disintegrated 73 seconds later in an explosion of hydrogen and oxygen. All seven crew members died. On February 3, President Reagan issued an executive order to set up a commission to investigate the challenger accident. The commission was sworn in on February 6, and presented its report to the president on June 6 of the same year.&#xD;&#xD;This report, commonly known as the Rogers Report, after its chairman William R. Roger, had a dual mandate from the president. First to look at the probable causes of the accident, and second, to develop recommendations for corrective action. This was done through a comprehensive investigation involving all of the following: interviews with more than 160 people, more than 35 formal panel investigations, examination of more than 6,300 documents (which included hundreds of photographs and more then 122,000 pages), the generation of almost 12,000 pages of transcript and another 2,800 pages of hearing transcripts.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Technology/Risk-Communication.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>