<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Scientific Communication&gt;Technical Illustration&gt;Visual Rhetoric</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Scientific-Communication/Technical-Illustration/Visual-Rhetoric</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Scientific Communication and Technical Illustration and Visual Rhetoric in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Dam Visuals: The Changing Visual Argument for the Glen Canyon Dam</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/30687.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/30687.html</guid>
		<description>Arguments manifest in scientific visuals through graphic representation, content placement, and overall document structure. These arguments, designed to influence public perception, change over time in relation to sociopolitical climate. Analysis of a series of documents constructed deliberately to influence perception can help to determine patterns of argumentation and perceived exigencies. In this article, four self-guided tour brochures produced for distribution to visitors to the Glen Canyon Dam in 1977, 1984, 1990, and 1993 are analyzed in order to identify rhetorical strategies designed to influence public perceptions of the dam site, and examine how public perception of the dam, and related argumentation, is structured by sociopolitical climate.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Relevance of Feenberg&apos;s Critical Theory of Technology to Critical Visual Literacy: The Case of Scientific and Technical Illustrations</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29162.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29162.html</guid>
		<description>Andrew Feenberg&apos;s critical theory of technology is an underutilized, relatively unknown resource in technical communication which could be exploited not only for its potential clarification of large social issues that involve our discipline, but also specifically toward the development of a critical theory of illustrations. Applications of critical theory help strengthen our discipline by forcing us to delineate extant approaches and consider whether democratic goals are being achieved through those approaches. If a critical theory of illustrations can be built from Feenberg&apos;s critical theory of technology, it should be useful for classroom instructors and researchers as well as theorists.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Scientific-Communication/Technical-Illustration/Visual-Rhetoric.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>