<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Rhetoric&gt;Theory&gt;Cultural Theory</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Rhetoric/Theory/Cultural-Theory</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Rhetoric and Theory and Cultural Theory in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Toward a Critical Perspective of Culture: Contrast or Compare Rhetorics</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/31782.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/31782.html</guid>
		<description>Kaplan&apos;s framework of contrastive rhetoric has been widely accepted in the field of cross-cultural technical communication. However, in the last four decades, contextual factors such as economic globalization trend and the advances of communication technologies are changing our ways of interacting with others. As a result our understanding of culture and cultural differences need to be adjusted. In this research, I start by recommending a workable definition of culture in the present context—culture as a process, which establishes a foundation for cross-cultural rhetorical research in the new era when communication across cultures transcends national boundaries. Based on the critical perspective of culture, I continue to point out the limitations of contrastive rhetoric and argue that contrastive rhetoric&apos;s view of culture and its research purpose and methodology need to be modified to overcome its constraints and better meet the needs of the present social context.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cultural Differences in the Appreciation of Introductions of Presentations</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/25766.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/25766.html</guid>
		<description>On the basis of both established theories of the differences between cultures and recommendations in advice literature from different cultures, we believe that it is likely that cultures will differ in what they consider to be an effective introduction to a presentation. In this article, we report on an exploratory experimental study with 300 respondents in the Netherlands, France, and Senegal regarding their appreciation of and response to three introductions to a presentation about a mobile phone. The results show that the cultures differ with respect to the introduction they prefer. The Dutch respondents appreciated the overview most, while the French respondents preferred the ethical appeal, and research participants from Senegal preferred the anecdote. It is likely that the introduction that gains greatest attention and that best increases the ability to listen in a culture will be most appreciated in that culture.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Selves, Subjects, and Agents: (Re)Positioning Agency with Self-Identity and Subjectivity</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/25322.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/25322.html</guid>
		<description>Through tracing some major historical influences and current theoretical perspectives of the human person, this article works toward providing both a foundation and rationale for a critical exploration of theories of agency, self-identity, and subjectivity. The first section traces the path of the Cartesian influence on current Western perceptions of the individual person, then reviews literature relevant to theories of self-identity, subjectivity, and agency within social construction, structuration theory, systems theory, and areas of cultural studies. Based upon these views of the human person, the second section examines agency as an under-theorized concept that requires further consideration (with self-identity and subjectivity) as a salient element of the person and theories of human identity in future research.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Talking with Virginia Postrel</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/21277.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/21277.html</guid>
		<description>Postrel&apos;s new book, The Substance of Style, explores the economic, cultural, social, personal, and political implications of the growing importance of aesthetics in business and society.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Rhetoric/Theory/Cultural-Theory.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>