<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Rhetoric&gt;Theory&gt;Activity Theory</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Rhetoric/Theory/Activity-Theory</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Rhetoric and Theory and Activity Theory in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Activity Theory: A Versatile Framework for Workplace Research</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/19837.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/19837.html</guid>
		<description>During the past decade activity theory has attracted a small but influential group of researchers in two fields that contribute to theory and research in technical communication: human-computer interaction and&#xD;composition studies. In my STC-sponsored research into&#xD;electronic editing in technical communication, I am&#xD;applying activity theory to provide a coherent&#xD;explanatory perspective on the findings of the qualitative&#xD;portion of my study. This paper provides a brief&#xD;introduction to activity theory and applies its analytical&#xD;framework to help make sense of the qualitative data I&#xD;gathered on electronic editing practices and attitudes in&#xD;three different technical communication workplaces.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Rhetoric/Theory/Activity-Theory.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>