| |||||||||
|
1. #25111 New Literacies and Old: A Dialogue Despite what some consider evidence to the contrary, the U.S.A. remains largely a nation of readers and writers. Moulthrop, Stuart and Nancy Kaplan. Kairos (2004). Articles>Rhetoric>Technology 2. #25110 So Much, So Far, So What? Progress and Prediction in Technorhetoric In any popular cultural innovation one cares to name, there is an explicit or implicit claim about the way that the innovation will 'change' or 'transform' life, its quality, or its effect. Whipple, Bob, Jr. and Robert S. Dornsife, Jr. Kairos (2004). Articles>Rhetoric>Technology 3. #29924 Technologizing Change: Rhetoric of Software Implementation at a University Campus This paper reports on a study of new software implementation at a university. Seven emails distributed by a central Office of Information Technology were examined for semantic (content) meaning and syntactic (grammatical) function. Semantic findings show a high degree of topical shift. Syntactic findings show a high number of clauses and complements. The analysis also shows how determiners were used to construct 'new' information as 'given' (presupposition). The paper argues that discursive stability was created by technologizing the rhetoric of implementation. The study concludes by suggesting that a heavy reliance on dependent clauses, along with other features, may be indicative of technologized discourse. Faber, Brenton D. ACM SIGDOC (2003). Articles>Technology>Software>Rhetoric 4. #24538 Toward a Feminist Rhetoric of Technology This article extends current thinking about the rhetoric of technology by making a preliminary inquiry into what a feminist rhetoric of technology might look like. On the basis of feminist critiques of technology in various disciplines, the author suggests three ways in which feminist approaches to building a rhetoric of technology might differ from current nonfeminist approaches to this task. First, feminist scholars should adopt a more expansive definition of technology than that which informs current rhetoric of technology research. Second, feminist scholars should ask different research questions than those being asked by current rhetoric-of-technology researchers. Third, feminist scholars should move beyond the design and development phases of technology, which most of the current research on the rhetoric of technology emphasizes. Koerber, Amy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication (1999). Articles>Rhetoric>Technology>Gender 5. #14021 Writing, Literacy and Technology: Toward a Cyborg Writing Like Jacques Derrida, Luce Irigaray, Lyotard, and others, Haraway calls for a conception of writing (“cyborg writing,” in her terms) that resists authoritative, phallogocentric writing practices, that foregrounds the writer’s own situatedness in history and in his or her writing practice, and that makes visible the very “apparatus of the production of authority” that all writers tend to submerge in their discourse. This is not to say that writers must “eschew” authority, but that in a truly ethical and postmodern stance they must reveal how authority is implicated in discourse. And because writing is inseparable both from its own embodied situatedness and from systems of liberation and domination, “literacy” should be a central concern of us all. Olson, Gary A. JAC (1996). Articles>Rhetoric>Technology
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
Click here to learn how to embed the RSS feed of this category in your website.