<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Rhetoric&gt;Correspondence</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Rhetoric/Correspondence</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Rhetoric and Correspondence in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Persuasive Techniques Used in Fundraising Messages</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29082.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29082.html</guid>
		<description>Based on an analysis of 63 fundraising packages representing 46 nonprofit organizations, as well as research in trade journals and other secondary sources, this study discusses a variety of persuasive techniques used in fundraising messages to accomplish their missions. The fundraising package consists of the carrier envelope, the fundraising letter, the reply form, the reply envelope, and optional enclosures such as brochures, small gifts for the reader, and surveys to complete. These parts work together to perform the following tasks: 1) persuade recipients to open the envelope and read the letter; 2) convince readers a serious but not unsolvable problem exists; 3) make readers want to help solve the problem; 4) convince readers they can help by giving to the appealing organization; 5) tell readers what the organization needs them to do; and 6) make it easy to comply.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Use of Pathos in Charity Letters: Some Notes Toward a Theory and Analysis</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29149.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29149.html</guid>
		<description>Americans contribute $240 billion dollars to charities each year, raised in part by writing letters to potential donors. While it is debatable what the reasons are for donors to give so much money, most donors seem to be moved to contribute by pathos, particularly pity. The concept of pathos as a rhetorical appeal has become more complex over the years, growing from a simple strategy to a complicated set of parameters requiring careful delineation. Beginning with the Greeks, particularly Aristotle, pathos was defined with greater clarity (especially the concept of enargia), with Aristotle&apos;s formal definitions of the emotions, and with the use of an image upon which to direct the audience&apos;s pity. Cicero adds to the theory by calling for the use of pathos in the peroration and reinforcing Aristotle&apos;s emphasis on careful audience analysis. St. Augustine and those who follow, including Renaissance, 18thcentury rhetoricians, and 20th-century scholars like Kenneth Burke, argue that style can also be an effective persuasive strategy for a pathetic appeal. Accordingly, the charity letters examined illustrate not only Aristotle&apos;s and Cicero&apos;s tenets but also show that elements of style, particularly rhetorical figures and schemes, are common rhetorical strategies used in these charity letters. While at first the rhetoric of charity letters seems simple and straightforward, to raise billions of dollars every year charity letters use sophisticated appeals to pity that have a long and interesting history.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Some Reflections on Explanation in Negative Messages</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/24558.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/24558.html</guid>
		<description>Scant research exists about explanation in negative messages. An important cause of this is the lack in extant literature of theory or conceptualization of explanation. This commentary provides two conceptual frameworks for thinking about explanation in negative messages: opportunity cost, from economic theory, and attribution, from marketing theory. Both frameworks help define the situations in which explanations for rejection should be provided to the targets of bad news. When applications are solicited, for instance, opportunity costs incurred by targets of bad news should be offset by senders with an offer to provide explanation. The construct of attribution is adapted here to suggest that senders of negative messages can benefit by supplying reasons for their denial of requests because, in the absence of the reasons, the rejectees will attribute motives and create reasons, thus depriving the senders of their control over the explanation portion of the messages.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Power Emails: How to Write Them</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/24523.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/24523.html</guid>
		<description>Most emails have lousy subject lines, are too wordy, and probably are deleted unread, read but not responded to, or filtered out as spam. Learn how to avoid these fates by composing Power Emails that are legal, ethical, and effective.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Write a Strong Close</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/23163.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/23163.html</guid>
		<description>If the average business letter starts poorly, then it invariably finishes poorly. Your closing paragraph should bring your letter to a polite, businesslike close. Typical final paragraphs in business letters invite the reader to write again or use overused and meaningless phrases that detract from the impact of the letter.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Letters and the Social Grounding of Differentiated Genres</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14068.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14068.html</guid>
		<description>Several times in my research over the years, I have noticed letters playing a role in the emergence of distinctive genres: the early scientific article emerging from the correspondence of Hans Oldenburg, the first editor of the Philosophic Transactions of the Royal Society; the patent, originally known as letters patent; stockholders&apos; reports evolving from letters to stockholders; and internal corporate reporting and record forms regularizing internal corporate correspondence.  was not the first to notice any of these; however, in putting the four cases together, it struck me that these may be part of a more general pattern. As I pursued the thought that letters might have a special role in genre formation, many other examples of genres with strong connections to correspondence came to my attention, including newspapers and other periodicals, financial instruments such as bills of exchange and letters of credit, books of the New Testament, papal encyclicals, and novels. The letter, in its directness of communication between two parties within a specific relationship in specific circumstances (all of which could be commented on directly), seemed to provide a flexible medium out of which many functions, relationships, and institutional practices might develop--making new uses socially intelligible at the same time as allowing the form of the communication to develop in new directions.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Rhetoric/Correspondence.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>