Making Wikis Work for Scholars
For all the hand-wringing over whether Wikipedia is a legitimate source for completing college assignments, some professors are quietly incorporating it into their classrooms and even their research. Others, noting features of the Web site that contribute to inaccuracies and shortchange the value of expertise, are building variations on the model that are more amenable to academics and to peer review.
Guess, Andy. Inside Higher Ed (2008). Articles>Research>Online>Wikis
The intention of this article is to open the readers eyes to the issues with trusting user edited content. Over time, the Wikipedia may balance out. Eventually, or possibly even now, user tests are being performed to see how much content is credible. Also, the academic communities could step up and decide unanimously that the Wikipedia is not a trusted body of information to use for research. Once this happens the Wikipedia will have to change the way information within their pages is handled to maintain existence.
Hall, Lawrence. Content Matters (2006). Articles>Research>Online>Wikis
There are 22 readers currently online: 1 registered user and 21 guests. Register.

![]()
![]()


![]()
![]()
![]()