<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Intellectual Property&gt;Copyright&gt;Case Studies</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Intellectual-Property/Copyright/Case-Studies</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Intellectual Property and Copyright and Case Studies in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Can Filesharers Be Triggered by Economic Incentives? Results of an Experiment</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/32343.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/32343.html</guid>
		<description>Illegal filesharing on the internet leads to considerable financial losses for artists and copyright owners as well as producers and sellers of music. Thus far, measures to contain this phenomenon have been rather restrictive. However, there are still a considerable number of illegal systems, and users are able to decide quite freely between legal and illegal downloads because the latter are still difficult to sanction. Recent economic approaches account for the improved bargaining position of users. They are based on the idea of revenue-splitting between professional sellers and peers. In order to test such an innovative business model, the study reported in this article carried out an experiment with 100 undergraduate students, forming five small peer-to-peer networks. The networks were confronted with different economic conditions. The results indicate that even experienced filesharers hold favourable attitudes towards revenue-splitting. They seem to be willing to adjust their behaviour to different economic conditions.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Remix as &quot;Fair Use&quot;: Grateful Dead Posters&apos; Re-Publication Held to Be a Transformative, Fair Use</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/28831.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/28831.html</guid>
		<description>On May 9, 2006, in Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the lower court, finding the use of several Grateful Dead Poster images appearing in a band biography was a &apos;fair use&apos; under section 107 of the US copyright statute. In the case, the publisher Dorling Kindersley used without permission seven images of Grateful Dead concert posters or tickets in the book Grateful Dead: The Illustrated Trip (2003). Prior to the book&apos;s publication, the publisher had unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate permissions with the copyright holder, Bill Graham Archives. Due to what the publisher perceived as an unreasonable licensing fee, permission agreements were never reached. Nonetheless, the publisher used the seven images in the book, incorporating them into remixed compositions, consisting of collages mixed with graphic art and textual explanations and commentary. Over 2000 images were used in the book. After the book&apos;s publication, Bill Graham Archives brought suit for copyright infringement, and requested an injunction blocking further publication.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Constitutional Law of Intellectual Property After Eldred v. Ashcroft</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/27119.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/27119.html</guid>
		<description>The past decade has witnessed an extraordinary blossoming of scholarship on the constitutional law of intellectual property, much of which focuses on copyright law. This article suggests that the scholarly debate will and should continue and that the proponents of constitutional limits are likely to enjoy some successes in the future, even if they did not do so in the Eldred case itself.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Intellectual-Property/Copyright/Case-Studies.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>