<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Information Design&gt;Standards&gt;Microsoft Word</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Information-Design/Standards/Microsoft-Word</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Information Design and Standards and Microsoft Word in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Format Comparison Between ODF and MS XML</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/27706.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/27706.html</guid>
		<description>There has been a lot of attention to the legal encumbrances in Microsoft&apos;s new MS XML format. In this article we&apos;ll look at the technical side, and try to show you how the design of these formats affect interoperability. After all, that is the purpose of open standards.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Information-Design/Standards/Microsoft-Word.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>