<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Education&gt;Instructional Design&gt;Testing</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Education/Instructional-Design/Testing</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Education and Instructional Design and Testing in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-10 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Test and Exercise Learning: Tests, Quizzes, and Self-Evaluations</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/22266.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/22266.html</guid>
		<description>Feared by learners, discounted by educational pundits, short-changed by instructional designers, tests are, nevertheless, an essential element of learning. We may call them quizzes, drills, examinations, assessments, competence monitors, or demonstrations of mastery. We may cloak them as games or puzzles. Yet, they remain an essential ingredient for gauging a learner’s progress.&#xD;&#xD;Tests, along with other kinds of activities, give learners an opportunity to apply the concepts, skills, and attitudes they have learned. Well designed tests provide a reliable way to measure progress objectively.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>In Defense of Cheating</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/18405.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/18405.html</guid>
		<description>I am not in favor of deception, trickery, fraud, or swindle. What I wish to change are the curriculum and examination practices of our school systems that insist on unaided work, arbitrary learning of irrelevant and uninteresting facts. I&apos;d like to move them toward an emphasis on understanding, on knowing how to get to an answer rather than knowing the answer, and on cooperation rather than isolation. Cheating that involves deceit is, of course wrong, but we should examine the school practices that lead to cheating: change the practices, and the deceit will naturally diminish.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Education/Instructional-Design/Testing.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>