<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Education&gt;Grammar</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Education/Grammar</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Education and Grammar in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>The Grammar Gravy Train</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/35585.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/35585.html</guid>
		<description>When you set yourself up as a grammar expert it&apos;s better than being an expert on plastics. To be an expert on plastics you actually have to know something about plastics. With grammar the analogous thing doesn&apos;t hold. Nobody asks, nobody checks, nobody knows enough to get suspicious. You are free as a bird to publish any garbage you might want to type out.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Some Thoughts on Teaching Grammar to Improve Writing</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29886.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29886.html</guid>
		<description>The conviction that writing can be improved with a knowledge of grammar has prevailed for quite a long time. But research has shown no correlation between grammatical knowledge and writing ability.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Equal Time: Grammar and Composition: Myths and Realities</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29377.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29377.html</guid>
		<description>Let&apos;s resist seduction by the mythologies of teaching and keep our grasp on the realities of learning.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>A Critique of Grammatical Coverage in Business-Communication Textbooks</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/26582.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/26582.html</guid>
		<description>Business English (BE) and business communication (BC) overlap. English handles linguistic mechanics and style, whereas communication holistically discusses the movement of a message from one person to another.  The BC discipline, unfortunately, allows language basics into its pedagogy like a statistics course teaching fundamental mathematics.  From the other side, some English courses teach BC before their students are able to handle that material.  A subject teaches prepared students.  If they are deficient, they are either kept out or the subject matter suffers.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Teaching a Workshop on Sentence Diagramming</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/15202.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/15202.html</guid>
		<description>Demonstrates how sentence diagramming can be an effective writing tool and offers tips on how it should be taught.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Education/Grammar.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>