Adapting Traditional Editing Practices for Online Documentation  

Technical editors are possibly best known for their abilities to transform information with format, content, grammatical, and mechanical problems into coherent, concise, understandable, and usable documents. Editors must not only provide such services for the information authors, but they must also understand and support users' needs and expectations. This presentation gives editors an approach to editing online documentation that is rooted in traditional editing practices.

Fink, Bonnie L., Carol Gasser, Jennifer Giordano and Beth A. Williams. STC Proceedings (1998). Articles>Editing>Documentation>Online

A Brief Guide to Communication Products Used in Online Learning

An overview of the various genres of information about online learning products.

Carliner, Saul. Saul Carliner Studio (2003). Articles>Editing>Online

E-Editing for Global Audiences  

The role of the technical communicator, including that of the technical editor, has evolved to encompass a broad range of responsibilities and skills. The familiar editing processes can be streamlined into four levels of editing, thus providing a basis for a business model for highperformance, global teams. By combining the familiar levels of editing with the latest innovations of one-page business plans, a streamlined e-editing model can be used by high-performance teams to produce high-quality information in a timely and an efficient manner for global audiences.

Adler, Linda J. and Helen Lenane. STC Proceedings (2003). Articles>Editing>Online

Editing Online Documents: Strategies and Tips    

This paper explains the basics of editing online documents: the issues, skills, strategies, and processes. Practical tips address editing the following: nonsequential content, structure and navigation, links, and online writing style. Most of these strategies and tips apply to both online technical documents and general purpose Web pages. However, they do not apply to PDF or PostScript™ documents that are posted online for printing purposes only.

Troffer, Alysson M. STC Proceedings (2002). Articles>Editing>Online

Editing Online Materials

Editing anything that is intended to be read on a computer rather than (or in addition to) being read on a paper copy.

Weber, Jean Hollis. ASTC (1996). Articles>Editing>Online

Electronic Editing in Technical Communication: A Model of User-centered Technology Adoption    

This article connects the research into electronic editing reported by the author in two previous articles to a well-established theory of innovation adoption and diffusion. Everett M. Rogers's theory is first summarized, with emphasis on the perceived characteristics of innovations central to the innovation-decision process. The three most important of these categories for organizing personal judgments about an innovation are used to develop a model of the innovation-decision process with regard to electronic editing in technical communication. The central role of reinvention in the gradual, erratic diffusion of diverse e-editing practices in technical communication is discussed. The author explains and advocates a user-centered ethic of technology adoption, a perspective that values the agency of workplace communities in selectively adopting and reinventing innovations to support the work they do while preserving or enhancing their quality of life on the job.

Dayton, David. Technical Communication Online (2004). Articles>Editing>Online

Electronic Editing in Technical Communication: Different Strokes for Different Folks  

The author conducted a multi-modal study of electronic editing practices, impacts, and attitudes among technical communicators. Data were gathered from focus groups and face-to-face and telephone interviews, as well as from email discussions and responses to open-ended questions on a Web-based survey. Observations based on a preliminary analysis of this data will be presented and discussed.

Dayton, David. STC Proceedings (1999). Articles>Editing>Online

Electronic Editing in Technical Communication: The Compelling Logics of Local Contexts    

Reports a qualitative study of e-editing practices and attitudes in specific workplace contexts. Sheds light on how specific workplace contexts influence perceptions and interpretations of e-editing's benefits and drawbacks.

Dayton, David. Technical Communication Online (2004). Articles>Editing>Online

Electronic Editing: Results of a Dual-Mode Survey  

The preliminary results from an STC-sponsored survey of electronic editing practices, impacts, and attitudes will be presented. In addition to a full-scale survey of a random sample of STC members, the research included a pilot survey administered on the World-Wide Web and a pretest using email software that automates the survey administration process. The potential advantages and problems associated with these innovative survey methods will be discussed.

Dayton, David. STC Proceedings (1999). Articles>Editing>Online

File-Exchange and Workflow Issues  

Suggests ways that editors can organize multiple versions of articles and avoid the pitfalls of transferring electronic files over the Internet.

Hart, Geoffrey J.S. Intercom (2000). Articles>Editing>Online

From the Margins to the Center: The Future of Annotation    

This article describes the importance of annotation to reading and writing practices and reviews new technologies that complicate the ways annotation can be used to support and enhance traditional reading, writing, and collaboration processes. Important directions for future research are discussed, with emphasis on studying how professionals read and annotate, how readers might use annotations that have been produced by others, and how the interface of an annotation program affects collaboration and communication on revision. In each area, the authors emphasize issues and methods that will be productive for enhancing theories of workplace and classroom communication as well as implications for the optimal design of annotation technologies.

Wolfe, Joanna L. and Christine M. Neuwirth. Journal of Business and Technical Communication (2001). Articles>Editing>Online

Implementing On-Screen Editing  

On-screen editing offers obvious advantages over paper editing, including greater accuracy, shorter turnaround times, and improved consistency. Because authors don’t have to retype handwritten edits, there’s less risk of misreading or missing corrections. Moreover, the edits have already been typed and spellchecked, so no new typos are introduced. Most editors can also enter corrections faster with a keyboard than with a pen, particularly when complex edits require restructuring of the document or extensive rewording, and eliminating the retyping phase further reduces turnaround times. Last but not least, using the search tools makes it easier to achieve consistency in long or complex documents.

Hart, Geoffrey J.S. Intercom (2004). Articles>Editing>Online

Internet Resources for Editors  

This month, I’ll depart slightly from my usual topic and focus on onscreen practices that aren’t actual edits—but that support activities such as fact-checking that we must perform while editing. Specifically, I’ll describe how to use the Internet as a research tool to improve the quality of your editing.

Hart, Geoffrey J.S. Intercom (2003). Articles>Editing>Online

"Just-in-Time" Documentation  

Discusses innovative ways to provide notations in electronic documents using Adobe Acrobat, Microsoft Word, and HTML. These methods include inserting text and voice comments, and displaying short messages.

Linderman, R. Ivan. Intercom (2000). Articles>Editing>Online

Keyboard Shortcuts and Other Tricks  

This column focuses on using a computer to increase the effectiveness (both the productivity and the quality) of editing manuscripts, with an emphasis on tools and techniques rather than issues of grammar and usage.

Hart, Geoffrey J.S. Intercom (2003). Articles>Editing>Online

Making Technical Reviews More Efficient  

This paper proposes the use of a database to collect and track technical review comments. It discusses the merits of using a database, provides a sample database structure, and describes use of the database in the review process.

Gelb, Janice. STC Proceedings (1999). Articles>Editing>Online

Online Editing, Mark-Up Models, and the Workplace Lives of Editors and Writers    

Despite the fact that most editing is still performed on paper, there are compelling reasons to begin marking copy on the computer.

Farkas, David K. and Steven E. Poltrock. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (1995). Articles>Editing>Online

Online Editing: Minimizing Your Turnaround Time  

Outlines an editing process that minimizes turnaround time by making the most of word processor technology.

Petersen, Judy H. Intercom (2000). Articles>Editing>Online

Overcoming Objections to Onscreen Editing  

Although onscreen editing has been available for many years, it remains underused in many workplaces. Editors offer many reasons for their reluctance to embrace this technology, and by understanding these reasons, it becomes possible to mitigate the problems and help editors begin using the technology. By doing so, managers can implement a process that is more efficient for both the editor and the authors being edited.

Hart, Geoffrey J.S. STC Proceedings (2003). Articles>Editing>Online

Patterns of Revision in Online Writing    

This study examines the revision histories of 10 Wikipedia articles nominated for the site's Featured Article Class (FAC), its highest quality rating, 5 of which achieved FAC and 5 of which did not. The revisions to each article were coded, and the coding results were combined with a descriptive analysis of two representative articles in order to determine revision patterns. All articles in both groups showed a higher percentage of additions of new material compared to deletions and revisions that rearranged the text. Although the FAC articles had roughly equal numbers of content and surface revisions, the non-FAC articles had fewer surface revisions and were dominated by content revisions. Although the unique features of the Wikipedia environment inhibit strict comparisons between these results and those of earlier revision studies, these results suggest revision in this environment places unique structural demands on writers, possibly leading to unique revision patterns.

Jones, John. Written Communication (2008). Articles>Editing>Online>Wikis

Technical Editing and Online Information: Features, Formatting and Friendliness  

Editing online information requires technical editors to modify their editing practices and become more involved in the information-design process.

Porter, Lynnette R. and William O. Coggin. STC Proceedings (1993). Articles>Editing>Online

Technology: A Blessing for Writers and Editors?

Computers have changed the way writers and editors work. But are we getting the most from the new tools?

Bodzin, Gene. Writer's Block (1996). Articles>Writing>Editing>Online

Using Virtual Peer Review through the Online Writing Center

Virtual Peer Review is an exercise in which students review the written work of other students in online or Internet-based settings. Just like peer review--an activity in which readers make suggestions for improvement on another person's writing--virtual peer review supports revision in the writing process. The difference is that this review process is conducted using online technologies.

University of Minnesota (2004). Articles>Education>Editing>Online

Why Edit On Screen?  

Provides a thorough introduction to the practices of on-screen editing, including how to make corrections, insert questions and suggestions, and communicate the results to the author.

Hart, Geoffrey J.S. Intercom (2000). Articles>Editing>Online