
Adding Life to Your Documentation

Suggests several techniques technical writers can use to enliven their writing and improve their documentation.
Potsus, Whitney Beth. Intercom (2003). Articles>Documentation>Writing>Technical Writing

Advantages of Using Microsoft SourceSafe While Writing Your Technical Documents
Microsoft’s Visual SourceSafe was not created with technical communicators in mind. It was created for engineers writing software source code. But it is successfully used by technical writers in offices around the world to control documentation.
Technical Communication Center (2009). Articles>Content Management>Documentation>Technical Writing

Anything That Can Go Wrong: Lessons Learned from A Decade of Toolkit Documentation

Writing software toolkit documentation for programmers is a special challenge and opportunity for technical writers. Compared with writing software documentation for lay users, toolkit documentation is more demanding and exacting. Checking facts and finding tiny errors is like riding a motorcycle through a swarm of gnats. However, for me at least, toolkit writing has opened doors to a larger role and greater input into product design. Engineers treat me like a peer and I get to see into their culture. I know my readers and salespeople need me.
van Oss, Joseph E. STC Proceedings (1999). Articles>Documentation>SDK>Technical Writing

Applying Web 2.0 Technologies to Technical Documentation
This article is based on my presentation at the Institute of Scientific and Technical Communicators' annual conference in October, 2006. Every now and then, there is a change in the value of what technical authors deliver. These are moments when organisations pay attention to technical documentation. This is because they recognise that these changes mean they can create something that will be of real value to the business and to their customers. In recent years, there have been three "waves of interestingness". The first wave was the introduction of Windows Help (WinHelp). The second major wave was the introduction of the Internet and intranets. This was a time when organisations looked at how they could transfer large amounts of information from paper to online. They were faced with issues such as how users could access and understand all this information easily - issues that technical communicators deal with on a day-to-day basis. I believe we're just about to approach the new wave, which we have called "Tech Writing 2.0".
Pratt, Ellis. Cherryleaf (2006). Articles>Web Design>Documentation>Technical Writing

Are We Giving Readers What They Want, in the Way They Want and Need It?
With all the talk about Web 2.0 and the attendant technologies, are readers actually being better served by documentation now than they were in the past?
DMN Communications (2008). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing>User Centered Design

The authoring tool does matter. Writers are focusing on the wrong set of issues (leading, kerning, print formatting), none of which is actually relevant for the output.
O'Keefe, Sarah S. Palimpsest (2009). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing>Software

Avoid the SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley) Documentation Nightmare With These Five Tips
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been called the most comprehensive reform of corporate law since the Securities Exchange Act was passed in 1934. The effects of SOX are far reaching. Its provisions govern actions by management, audit committees, and boards of directors of public companies. Like it or not, Sarbanes-Oxley is here to stay. Its impact on IT departments is major and growing. The reaction of many IT groups is to document everything in sight in an attempt to cover themselves. In the end, this can be counter-productive, expensive and wasteful.
D'Amico, Vin. IT World Canada (2006). Articles>Documentation>Regulatory Writing

Baselining Documentation on a Wiki
The dynamic nature of wikis can cause a few headaches when you need to baseline documentation that's on a wiki to correspond with the release of your product. This blog post looks at some ways in which you can try baselining wiki content.
DMN Communications (2008). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing>Wikis

Benefits of Using a Professional to Write User Documentation
Studies have shown organisations value the following benefits: overall organisation, the sales team, and documentation meets the customer's requirements.
Cherryleaf (2003). Articles>Writing>Professionalism>Documentation

Betriebsanleitungen für Anlagen 
Der Normenunterausschuss NATG-F des Deutschen Instituts für Normung e.V. ist derzeit damit befasst, Regeln zur Erstellung von Betriebsanleitungen für Anlagen zu erarbeiten.
Doculine (2002). (German) Articles>Documentation>Writing>Technical Writing

Brokedown Palace Part 2: Workflows for Fun and Profit
If you're going to toss out your user guides, you'd better have a good user interface and concise supporting materials. Workflows can help you both in the design of the user interface and in the creation of job aids for the people who use your product. A workflow is a compact and effective way to describe the flow of any procedure. How many times have you grumbled about the design of a piece of software or Web site that you've been trying to use? Chances are that no one ever sat down to model it using the workflow technique.
Knowles, Michael. Write Thinking (2002). Articles>Writing>Documentation

Brokedown Palace, Part 1: Why User Guides Don't Work 
Software user guides use up an awful lot of space with screen shots. But I know what the screen looks like -- it's right in front of me. Any decent GUI design is self-documenting to some extent, at least. No matter how much we complain about them, GUIs have gotten pretty good. Children have them figured out in minutes. And then they start asking questions like, 'How do I make my stick man move around?' Computers are toasters or drawing pads to them. That's another reason user guides don't work: the average user doesn't need one anymore.
Knowles, Michael. Write Thinking (2002). Articles>Writing>Documentation>Screen Captures

Learn about theoretical and practical examples of merging DITA (Darwin Information Typing Architecture), a structured authoring methodology, and wiki’s freeform authoring and editing capabilities.
Gentle, Anne and Lisa Dyer. Intercom (2008). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing>Wikis

MacDonald analyzes the success of irreverent software manuals such as the 'For Dummies' and 'Complete Idiot's' series and suggests ways writers of traditional technical manuals can make their own work more enjoyable to read.
MacDonald, Matthew P. Intercom (2001). Articles>Documentation>Writing>Technical Writing

Case Study: Communication Problem vs. Programming Problem
In looking at my documentation, I found a couple of inaccuracies, and it’s possible that they were the direct cause of the data problem we ended up with. I haven’t verified this yet because at this point, it looks like it hardly matters (as long as I correct the inaccuracies). If my documentation led to the problem, it has led us to analyze a bigger problem that’s really at the heart of our customer’s difficulty. The discussion has been about what needs to happen in our system vs. what is actually happening. We think the programming and the data model have fallen short in some ways; fortunately, the wiring can probably be fixed with relatively little pain. It’s a matter of making sure we know what the customer wants to happen so it will be programmed the right way.
Minson, Benjamin. Gryphon Mountain (2010). Articles>Documentation>Quality>Technical Writing

There's a shift happening in the way in which documentation is produced. We’ve all seen the beginning of it: the growing volume of what’s called (among other things) user generated or crowdsourced documentation. That trend is growing. And while a number of people in our profession are still resistant to the idea, it’s only a matter of time before users are our main partners in creating documentation.
Nesbitt, Scott. DMN Communications (2009). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing>Social Networking

Change Your Writing Style to Make Documentation More Usable and User-Friendly
When the subjects of usability and user friendliness in relation to documentation are broached, writing isn’t often the first thing that comes to mind. But it should be.
Nesbitt, Scott. DMN Communications (2009). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing>Usability

I like the concept of not treating the readers of documentation like idiots. This little card gave me the information that I needed and couldn’t know ahead of time (how much water to use, the filter looks too big but is the right size, only push the button once) without wasting my time by giving me information that I either already knew or could easily guess (I can get water from the sink, I need to use a cup). Can we use this concept in software documentation? What parts can safely be left out so that we are only highlighting the pieces that are really needed?
Miller, Lynn. Designing the User Experience at Autodesk (2009). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing

Collaborative Walkthrough Video
Collaborative walkthroughs are a technique that my team used while rewriting our Help and adopting DITA. We believe that we were able to improve the user experience by improving the collaborative experience.
Bennett, Miranda. On Writing (2008). Articles>Documentation>Collaboration>Technical Writing

Converting to Information Mapping: A Case Study 
Cisco Systems, Inc., uses electronic media as the primary delivery means for customer documentation and training. Information Mapping® techniques are being developed as a methodology for creating and linking modules of customer information. After selecting the Information Mapping methodology, we found it necessary to customize it for our needs. To implement Information Mapping methodology, we defined a system architecture consisting of three main subsystems: a document management subsystem, an authoring environment, and a publishing or delivery subsystem, In parallel with the customization and development of a system architecture, several writers began to implement the Information Mapping techniques to provide content to be put into the system being developed.
Garrett, Aviva, Haggai Mark and Jan Johnston-Tyler. STC Proceedings (1996). Articles>Documentation>Writing>Technical Writing

Creating Professional Documentation with Linux Tools
While Linux lacks standard Windows tools such as FrameMaker, RoboHelp, and WebWorks Publisher, it's still a viable environment for technical writers. Linux users can take advantage of a number of documentation tools, including both free or open source software (FOSS) and proprietary software. All of them give technical writers the ability to author and publish professional documentation.
Nesbitt, Scott. Linux.com (2006). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing>Linux

Creating Snippets from Multiple Blocks in Flare
When you are writing content in Flare, you may decide that you want to re-use some content that you previously added to another topic. We’ve discussed before how the best way to do this is to use a snippet, which essentially is a really long, formatted variable. To do this in Flare, you create a new snippet, then you locate the text you want to re-use, and copy the text out of that topic and paste it into the snippet. Then you replace the text in the original topic with the snippet, then insert the snippet into the new location.
Pehrson, Paul. DocGuy Training (2009). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing>Madcap Flare

Creating Topics: Where do you Draw the Line?
It's hard to look at a page of text and try to decide where to divide things to create individual topics. That "bottom up" approach is kind of pointless, in fact. There are better ways.
Armstrong, Eric. Sun Microsystems (2008). Articles>Documentation>Information Design>Technical Writing

Creating User-Friendly Documentation 
We often hear that users do not read documents. To lure readers into reading our documents, we must make documents user-friendly.
Bhatia, Neeraj. Indus (2002). Articles>Documentation>User Centered Design>Technical Writing

A Critical Assessment of the Minimalist Approach to Documentation 
Carroll's (1991) minimal manual has been considered an important advance in teaching first-time users the basics of computer programs. Unfortunately, it is not very clear what minimalism really means. Practitioners, for example, will find it difficult to create their own minimal manual because the principles of minimalism have not been described in enough detail (see Horn, 1992; Tripp, 1990). It is also not yet settled that a minimalist approach is the most effective one because critical experiments have hardly been conducted. This study therefore closely examines the minimalist principles and claims. This paper describes the basic ideas of minimalism, its design principles and how they can be operationalized. A parallel is drawn between a minimalist and constructivist perspective on learning and instruction. Like minimalism, constructivism places a high value on experience-based learning in context-rich environments. Like minimalism, it stresses the need to capitalize on the learner's prior knowledge as much as possible. And like minimalism, constructivists urge learners to follow their own plans and goals, to make inferences, and to abstract principles from what they experience (see Duffy & Jonassen, 1991, 1992). An experiment is reported that examines the claims of minimalism. Strong and significant gains on several factors were found, all favoring the minimal manual over a control (conventional) manual. The discussion points to several issues that minimalism has yet to address.
van der Meij, Hans. ACM SIGDOC (1998). Articles>Documentation>Technical Writing>Minimalism
In total there are 10 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 9 guests
. Register.

![]()
![]()


![]()
![]()
![]()