<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Communication&gt;Environmental&gt;Government</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Communication/Environmental/Government</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Communication and Environmental and Government in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Evaluating Environmental Impact Statements as Communicative Action</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/24584.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/24584.html</guid>
		<description>An environmental impact statement (EIS) is supposed to ensure that a government agency thoroughly evaluates a project&apos;s impacts, studies feasible alternatives, and gives all stakeholders an active role in project-related decisions. Previous rhetorical studies of the EIS describe a failed or subversive genre routinely used to advance the strategic aims of an agency seeking to implement a project despite significant opposition. This article contends that an EIS motivated by a genuinely persuasive purpose can serve as the discursive focus of democratic decision making about major projects and substantially achieve Habermas&apos;s norms of communicative action. This may happen, for example, when a local transportation agency develops an EIS for a federal transportation agency. To illustrate this possibility, two EISs involving distinct federal-local relationships in Puerto Rico are evaluated using criteria proposed by John Forester for investigating the degree to which public decision-making processes fulfill Habermas&apos;s norms of communicative action.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Communication/Environmental/Government.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>