<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Articles&gt;Business Communication&gt;Reports&gt;Rhetoric</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Business-Communication/Reports/Rhetoric</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Articles and Business Communication and Reports and Rhetoric in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Applying the Elaboration Likelihood Model to Technical Recommendation Reports</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/30386.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/30386.html</guid>
		<description>Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) can help proposal writers identify effective document design techniques and parts of arguments that are critical to persuasion. In addition, ELM has implications for other types of technical communication, including recommendation or feasibility reports. While one would anticipate that decision-makers would be willing and able to evaluate critically all arguments presented in a recommendation report, ELM explains why this is rarely so. Therefore, technical communicators can profit by understanding and using the two routes to persuasion or attitude shift, the central and peripheral routes, explained by ELM.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Articles/Business-Communication/Reports/Rhetoric.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>