<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Academic&gt;Documentation&gt;DocBook&gt;DITA</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Academic/Documentation/DocBook/DITA</link>
	<description>A listing of the most recently indexed works about Academic and Documentation and DocBook and DITA in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>DITA, DocBook and the Art of the Document</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/32037.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/32037.html</guid>
		<description>Both the DITA and the DocBook specification are quite alive and well in organizations, and each is evolving into its own distinct application niches, with DITA looking to be turning into the default standard for large scale enterprises, while DocBook works more effectively at the small to intermediate level. What’s perhaps more interesting is the Microsoft Word, even with support for XML as provided by OOXML, is not making as much of an inroad in the structured document market, in great part because it is fairly difficult to constrain people’s use of the word-processing program to a limited, finite subset of potential styles.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/dir/Academic/Documentation/DocBook/DITA.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>