<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Williams, Julia M.</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Williams,_Julia_M.</link>
	<description>A bibliography of works by Williams, Julia M. in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>What Do We Gain by Assessment?</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/31669.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/31669.html</guid>
		<description>The question, what do we gain by assessment, is one that has been asked more and more often by engineering educators. They ask the question even as the changes in accreditation brought on by ABET, Inc. and the Engineering Criteria have been cemented in programs both in the United States and abroad.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>ABET Countdown</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/26501.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/26501.html</guid>
		<description>How could four letters strike such fear in the hearts of normally stalwart faculty? Why would administrators loathe the mere mention of the word &apos;accreditation&apos;? The source of their fear and frustration is a cycle of evaluation, assessment, and reporting that constitutes a six-year accreditation period.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Technical Communication, Engineering, and ABET&apos;s Engineering Criteria 2000: What Lies Ahead?</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/13539.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/13539.html</guid>
		<description>The tools engineers use have changed so dramatically over the past 30 years, universities and colleges have adapted by offering their engineering students classes in the latest technologies so they are better prepared to enter the engineering workplace. Engineers often feel less prepared, however, for the nontechnical demands of their jobs. They may possess the technical skills necessary to solve a machine problem in a manufacturing line but feel less prepared to tell the owners of the line what needs to be changed and why. As a result, industry and business have complained to universities and colleges (and particularly to engineering programs) that engineering students are not ready to take on the nontechnical challenges of modern engineering work. And because engineering programs rely on industry and businesses to hire their students, they have taken these demands seriously.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Williams,_Julia_M..xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>