<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Lay, Mary M</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Lay,_Mary_M</link>
	<description>A bibliography of works by Lay, Mary M in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-10 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Feminist Theory and the Redefinition of Technical Communication</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/33580.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/33580.html</guid>
		<description>To study the possible impact of feminist theory on technical communication, this article discusses six common characteristics of feminist theory: (a) celebration of difference, (b) impact on social change, (c) acknowledgment of scholars&apos; backgrounds and values, (d) inclusion of women&apos;s experience, (e) study of gaps and silences in traditional scholarship, and (f) new female sources of knowledge. Three debates within feminist theory spring out of these common characteristics: whether to stress similarity or difference between the sexes, whether differences come from biological or social forces, and whether feminist scholars can avoid reinforcing binary opposition. The article then traces the impact of these characteristics of feminist theory and debates within feminist theory on the redefinition of technical communication in terms of the myth of scientific objectivity, the new interest in ethnographic studies of workplace communication, and the recent focus on collaborative writing.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Reflections on Technical Communication Quarterly, 1991-2003: The Manuscript Review Process</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29210.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29210.html</guid>
		<description>This article traces the development of Technical Communication Quarterly (TCQ), beginning with the first issue in the winter of 1991, through the 2003 issues. As co-editor of TCQ, charged with the manuscript review process, I shepherded more than 350 manuscripts through evaluation and about one-fourth of those through publication. In this article, I explain that process and how it changed when The Technical Writing Teacher became TCQ and what features our reviewers now believe make a successful TCQ article.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Lay,_Mary_M.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>