<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Kroitor, Harry P. and Elizabeth Tebeaux</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Kroitor,_Harry_P._and_Elizabeth_Tebeaux</link>
	<description>A bibliography of works by Kroitor, Harry P. and Elizabeth Tebeaux in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Bringing Literature Teachers and Writing Teachers Closer Together</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/23333.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/23333.html</guid>
		<description>Many traditional college English departments now find themselves in an unpalatable predicament. Pressure from the marketplace and from other college disciplines has made clear that students need more than basic composition skills. They need skills to communicate effectively in business, research, and industrial environments. While enrollments in traditional literature courses have continued to decline, English departments are asked to staff and teach an increasing number of courses in various types of technical writing. These two trends have produced a less than harmonious climate within many English departments. Technical writing courses are often viewed by literature teachers as alien intruders unrelated both to the established goals of an English department and to the attempt to encourage and preserve the study of humanities and aesthetics. Many teachers see technical writing as intellectually arid, controlled only by format and mechanical approaches to clarity. Many more consider it antiliterature, unsympathetic to the methods used to teach literary analysis and appreciation.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Kroitor,_Harry_P._and_Elizabeth_Tebeaux.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>