<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Idoura, Alexia</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Idoura,_Alexia</link>
	<description>A bibliography of works by Idoura, Alexia in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Improving Technical Reviews</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/28176.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/28176.html</guid>
		<description>Improving technical reviews, when subject matter experts, or SMEs, review content for technical accuracy, is a challenge every technical communicator faces sometime during their career. Every year, journal articles are published, presentations are made, and discussions are initiated on this very topic. Most of them conclude that SMEs are difficult. It&apos;s your job to bribe, cajole, or coerce a better review out of your SME. I don&apos;t agree.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Idoura,_Alexia.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>