<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Horn, Robert E</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Horn,_Robert_E</link>
	<description>A bibliography of works by Horn, Robert E in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>The Nurnberg Funnel by John M. Carroll</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29396.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29396.html</guid>
		<description>In the Nurnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction, John Carroll presents some helpful ideas based on some useful research on how the initial self-instruction (often called &apos;tutorials&apos;) should be developed and written.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Two Approaches to Modularity: Comparing the STOP Approach with Structured Writing</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/29395.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/29395.html</guid>
		<description>The first time I heard of the STOP paper was sometime in the mid 80&apos;s when the historian of technical writing, John Brockman, phoned me to ask if my Information Mapping method of structured writing derived from the STOP method. At the time I told Brockman that there was no direct relationship between our two approaches since I&apos;d never read the paper. When the editor of this journal sent me the STOP document in preparation for writing this paper, I read it with delight. Although our two innovations date from the same period, the STOP authors and I were working in two completely different disciplines, cultures, organizations, and locations. These two approaches resulted in modularity - albeit of quite different kinds. The main purpose of this project is to compare and contrast these two approaches to modularity. I should note here that I approach this article principally as an exercise in historical comparison, rather than as an exposition of my current views, about which I will say a bit at the end of this article.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Horn,_Robert_E.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>