<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Bryan, John G.</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Bryan,_John_G.</link>
	<description>A bibliography of works by Bryan, John G. in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Authorship and Responsibility: The Problem of Special Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/30389.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/30389.html</guid>
		<description>The ethical questions that technical communicators face frequently present themselves obliquely, arising because the communicators depend heavily upon the special knowledge of other people who provide necessary information. The special knowledge that communicators lack and others possess may come from highly technical education, privileged access to information sources, or socially constructed access to information. Proponents of need-to-know policies may argue that limiting communicators&apos; knowledge absolves them of responsibility for the information&apos;s veracity and effects; however, more ethically rigorous considerations of the issue consider communicators&apos; authorial roles, their right to know, and their responsibility to their audiences.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Evolution of a Disclaimer</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/28276.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/28276.html</guid>
		<description>What if a disclaimer seems to be more than just a disclaimer? Readers are invited to consider the fictitious case presented and to share their thoughts for publication in an upcoming issue of Intercom.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>An Ethical Gamble</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/24169.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/24169.html</guid>
		<description>Are the ethical issues affected by a vendor&apos;s status as an offshore operation? By the prospect of Internet gambling becoming illegal in the U.S. (bill pending in the U.S. House of Representatives)? By the presumption of shady morals in the gambling industry? Should one&apos;s choices be affected by his/her rocky employment history? </description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Alienation</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/21183.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/21183.html</guid>
		<description>A hypothetical example to help technical communicators think through ethical issues in the workplace (before they occur in real life).</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Graphs on Steroids</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/21185.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/21185.html</guid>
		<description>A hypothetical example to help technical communicators think through ethical issues in the workplace.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Responses to &quot;Alienation&quot;</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/21190.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/21190.html</guid>
		<description>In the April 2003 issue, &lt;i&gt;Intercom&lt;/i&gt; printed a hypothetical dilemma by John G. Bryan entitled &apos;Alienation.&apos; A summary of this story appears in the box on this page; reader responses appear below. The responses do not reflect the views of STC&apos;s ethics committee and may have been edited for length.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>In the Company of Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14749.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14749.html</guid>
		<description>In this hypothetical dilemma, a senior technical writer at a pharmaceuticals firm must choose between honoring his company&apos;s nondisclosure policy or publishing the results of a usability study that could greatly improve patient compliance with written instructions for prescription drugs, thereby saving lives.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>In the Gyres</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14661.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14661.html</guid>
		<description>A fictional account of an in-house newsletter editor pressured to serve his bosses&apos; interests raises important questions about the ethics of office politics.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Responses to &apos;In the Company of Lawyers&apos;</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14770.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14770.html</guid>
		<description>This article presents reader responses to an ethics case published in the March 2002 issue of Intercom.</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Responses to &apos;In the Gyres&apos;</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/14674.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/14674.html</guid>
		<description>In the September/October 2000 issue, Intercom printed a hypothetical dilemma entitled &apos;In the Gyres.&apos; A summary of this story is reproduced, followed by reader responses.</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Bryan,_John_G..xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>