<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Ballstaedt, Steffen Peter</title>	<link>http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Ballstaedt,_Steffen-Peter</link>
	<description>A bibliography of works by Ballstaedt, Steffen Peter in the field of technical communication.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005-08 by the EServer. All rights reserved.</copyright>
	<managingEditor>tclib-editorial@eserver.org (TC Library Editorial Board)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>webmaster@eserver.org (Geoffrey Sauer)</webMaster>
	
	<item>
		<title>Interactive and Animated Pictures: Mere Visual Stimulation or Better Clarity?</title>
		<link>http://tc.eserver.org/27911.html</link>
		<guid>http://tc.eserver.org/27911.html</guid>
		<description>Digitalisation has revolutionised the creation and editing of graphics, and ushered in new forms of technical communication on the visual plane. In online documentation, interactive illustrations and animations play an important role, but creating them is definitely time consuming and expensive. But is all the effort really worthwhile? Are animated and interactive images automatically also self-explanatory? Or what are their didactic benefits?</description>
	</item>
	<atom:link href="http://tc.eserver.org/authors/Ballstaedt,_Steffen-Peter.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
</channel>
</rss>