Examining Editor-Author Ethics: Real-World Scenarios from Interviews with Three Journal Editors
http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=15H1U775080K4833
  access restricted (by the publisher) to members/subscribers/customers only
  peer-reviewed

Amare, Nicole and Alan Manning
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
2009

Abstract:

Those who submit manuscripts to academic journals may benefit from a better understanding of how editors weigh ethics in their interactions with authors. In an attempt to ascertain and to understand editors' ethics, we interviewed 3 current academic journal editors of technical and/or business communication journals. We asked them about the ethical dilemmas they encountered while working with authors, whether the editors formally or informally followed a "code of ethics," and if they felt obligated to maintain any ethical codes in particular. In this article, we discuss the ethical dimensions of editorial practices using specific ethical scenarios provided by these three editors. We then analyze these scenarios using traditional ethical models in our field but also in terms of a less-known but powerful model of ethical analysis originally proposed by the philosopher C. S. Peirce. We argue that Peirce's "community of inquiry" ethics model best describes these journal editors' ethics when working with authors.