
Although ethnography has become a common approach in HCI research and design, considerable confusion still attends both ethnographic practice and the metrics by which
it should be evaluated in HCI. Often, ethnography is seen as
an approach to field investigation that can generate
requirements for systems development; by that token, the
major evaluative criterion for an ethnographic studies is the
implications it can provide for design. Exploring the nature
of ethnographic inquiry, this paper suggests that
“implications for design” may not be the best metric for
evaluation and may, indeed, fail to capture the value of
ethnographic investigations. View both works published by University of California Irvine |