Linguistic Bias in Personnel Selection
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07313653
  access restricted (by the publisher) to members/subscribers/customers only
  peer-reviewed

Rubini, Monica and Michela Menegatti
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
2008

Abstract:

The present research examines how hiring committees strategically use language abstraction to collectively account for their decision to hire a job applicant over the others. In addition, the authors investigate how work interdependence between single members of hiring committees and applicants and common affiliation to the same work organization affect the language used to write individual reports on job candidates. Results of the first study show that selected applicants were described with positive terms at a higher level of abstraction and negative terms at a lower level of abstraction. The second study supports the selection linguistic bias in individually written reports and demonstrates that members of hiring committees describe interdependent applicants and those belonging to their group with negative terms at a lower level of abstraction than other applicants. The implications of the findings for the wider personnel selection context are discussed.