 | |  |  | 

This article investigates the critical thinking difficulties of finance majors when asked to address ill-structured finance problems. The authors build on previous research in which they asked students to analyze an ill-structured investment problem and recommend a course of action. The results revealed numerous critical thinking weaknesses, including a failure to address the client's problem, use analytical tools systematically, construct rhetorically useful graphics,
or translate finance concepts and methodologies into lay language. The present
research aims to understand more deeply why students struggle with ill-structured
problems. Using think-aloud protocols, audiotaped interviews, and other strategies,
the authors explore causes of finance students' difficulties and suggest strategies
for addressing them. The results suggest that the homework tasks typically
given them, such as quantitative problem sets using algorithmic procedures,
do not prepare them to confront ill-structured problems requiring disciplinary
arguments aimed at specified audiences. Research further suggests that teaching
audience adaptation--especially for nonexpert audiences--is helpful
in promoting critical thinking. View all 70 works published by Business Communication Quarterly |
 Messy Problems and Lay Audiences: Teaching Critical Thinking Within the Finance Curriculum http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1080569908318202
access restricted (by the publisher) to members/subscribers/customers only
peer-reviewed
Carrithers, David, Teresa Ling and John C. Bean Business Communication Quarterly 2008
Abstract: This article investigates the critical thinking difficulties of finance majors when asked to address ill-structured finance problems. The authors build on previous research in which they asked students to analyze an ill-structured investment problem and recommend a course of action. The results revealed numerous critical thinking weaknesses, including a failure to address the client's problem, use analytical tools systematically, construct rhetorically useful graphics,
or translate finance concepts and methodologies into lay language. The present
research aims to understand more deeply why students struggle with ill-structured
problems. Using think-aloud protocols, audiotaped interviews, and other strategies,
the authors explore causes of finance students' difficulties and suggest strategies
for addressing them. The results suggest that the homework tasks typically
given them, such as quantitative problem sets using algorithmic procedures,
do not prepare them to confront ill-structured problems requiring disciplinary
arguments aimed at specified audiences. Research further suggests that teaching
audience adaptation--especially for nonexpert audiences--is helpful
in promoting critical thinking.
|
 |
 |  |