Added by Geoff Sauer on Jun 06, 2008.
Average rating: 3.00/5.00 (n=1)
 


This article invokes Habermas's ideal speech situation to analyze the controversy surrounding a recent study of pain relief for women in labor. Using Habermas's concepts, the authors argue that distortion of scientific and medical information originated in the New England Journal of Medicine article that first reported the study's results. Thus, their analysis aims to complicate the assumption that such distortion starts only with public reporting and to expose the ways that scientific or medical research from the beginning can be reported to either facilitate or preclude public debate and understanding of complex issues. 
  View all 107 works published by Journal of Business and Technical Communication  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Distortion and the Politics of Pain Relief: A Habermasian Analysis of Medicine in the Media".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués