Added by Geoff Sauer on Jan 08, 2008.
Average rating: 4.00/5.00 (n=2, std dev: 1.41)
 


Arguments manifest in scientific visuals through graphic representation, content placement, and overall document structure. These arguments, designed to influence public perception, change over time in relation to sociopolitical climate. Analysis of a series of documents constructed deliberately to influence perception can help to determine patterns of argumentation and perceived exigencies. In this article, four self-guided tour brochures produced for distribution to visitors to the Glen Canyon Dam in 1977, 1984, 1990, and 1993 are analyzed in order to identify rhetorical strategies designed to influence public perceptions of the dam site, and examine how public perception of the dam, and related argumentation, is structured by sociopolitical climate.
 
  View both works by Ross, Derek G.  
  View all 215 works published by Journal of Technical Writing and Communication  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Dam Visuals: The Changing Visual Argument for the Glen Canyon Dam".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués