Added by Geoff Sauer on Dec 16, 2007.
Average rating: 3.00/5.00 (n=2, std dev: 0.00)
 


If we've been asked by a peer to review his or her work before it is sent out to be scrutinized by the world, our job is to neither edit nor rewrite the information. Our job is to give helpful, specific feedback about where the information communicates well and where it needs work. The more we understand about how to review a peer's work effectively, and how doing this is different from editing, the better feedback we can provide.
 
  View both works by Gillihan, Dana L.  
  View all 2240 works published by STC Proceedings  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Reviewing a Peer's Work".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués