Added by Geoff Sauer on Jul 13, 2007.
Average rating: 4.00/5.00 (n=2, std dev: 1.41)
 


One of the signatures of scientific writing is its ability to present the claims of science as if they were "untouched by human hands." In the early years of experimental education, researchers achieved this by adopting a citational practice that led to the sedimentation of their cardinal method, the analysis of variance, and their standard for statistical significance, 0.05. This essentially divorces their statistical framework from its historical conditions of production. Researchers suppressed their own agency through the use of passive voice and nominalization. With their own agency out of the way, they imbued the methods, results, and presentational devices themselves with the active agency of the situation through the use of personification. Such a depiction creates the impression that the researchers and audience stand on equal epistemic ground as interested witnesses to the autonomous activity of a third party, the method, which churns out the brute facts of science.
 
  View all five works by Little, Joseph  
  View all 234 works published by Journal of Technical Writing and Communication  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Peter Effect in Early Experimental Education Research".
 PoorExcellent 
click this box if you find the link above broken or out-of-date.

Copyright © 2001-12 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués