Added by Geoff Sauer on May 18, 2006.
Average rating: 2.50/5.00 (n=8, std dev: 1.69)
 


This study compared two evaluation techniques, Usability Testing and Cognitive Walkthrough, in their ability to identify errors in aviation maintenance documentation. The techniques were evaluated to see how much unique information they each produced as well as the type of errors identified. Results showed that the techniques were complementary in their findings and both are recommended in the development of technical documentation.
 
  View both works by Rogers, Bonnie Lida, Chris Hamblin and Alex Chaparro  
  View all 104 works published by Usability News  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Comparison of Two Evaluation Techniques for Technical Documentation".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués