Added by Geoff Sauer on May 08, 2006.
Average rating: 3.17/5.00 (n=6, std dev: 0.75)
 


It is widely assumed that 5 participants suffice for usability testing. In this study, 60 users were tested and random sets of 5 or more were sampled from the whole, to demonstrate the risks of using only 5 participants and the benefits of using more. Some of the randomly selected sets of 5 participants found 99% of the problems; other sets found only 55%. With 10 users, the lowest percentage of problems revealed by any one set was increased to 80%, and with 20 users, to 95%.
 
  View both works by Faulkner, Laura  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Beyond the Five-User Assumption: Benefits of Increased Sample Sizes in Usability Testing".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués