Added by Geoff Sauer on Apr 20, 2006.
Average rating: 3.86/5.00 (n=7, std dev: 1.46)
 


Differences in national intellectual property rules may cause economic activity to shift from one jurisdiction to another such that a higher protection rule in one jurisdiction will be undermined by lower protection rules in other jurisdictions. This article illustrates this phenomenon with four examples: as to rules on the enforceability of anti-reverse engineering clauses of software licenses, the protectability of bio-engineered research tools, peer to peer file sharing, and exceptions to anti-circumvention rules. It considers several options nations may have to respond to intellectual property arbitrages, none of which is likely to be very effective.
 
  View all 18 works by Samuelson, Pamela  
  View all 21 works published by University of California Berkeley  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Intellectual Property Arbitrage: How Foreign Rules Can Affect Domestic Protections".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués