Added by Geoff Sauer on Nov 17, 2004.
Average rating: 2.00/5.00 (n=3, std dev: 1.73)
 


This study surveys scientific and technical communicators to determine their perceptions of their role as interviewees in the performance appraisal interview. The results reveal that interviewees think the appraisal process is unreliable and invalid, that managers do not stimulate growth and development in the appraisal interview, and that subordinates have little influence concerning what goes on in the department. Other results are discussed in the paper.
 
  View both works by McDowell, Earl E.  
  View all 2240 works published by STC Proceedings  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Scientific and Technical Communicators' Perceptions of the Performance Appraisal Interview".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués