 | | | |
Traditionally, verification of documentation procedure accuracy follows a standard model: technical communicators prepare a draft, which is submitted to subject matter experts for review. This process hinges on a number of factors that can adversely affect the quality of the review. Higher quality reviews are conducted by staff tasked specifically to test and review the draft procedures, and supply specific feedback by means of an established procedure. A well-established method of documentation testing provides several benefits to an organization. These include customer satisfaction, reduced costs, improved overall product quality, and improved document draft correction.
View all three works by Lippincott, Richard J.
View all 2240 works published by STC Proceedings |
Methods for Documentation Testing in Technical Publications Quality Assurance
http://www.stc.org/ConfProceed/2003/PDFs/STC50-106.pdf
Lippincott, Richard J.
STC Proceedings
2003
Abstract: Traditionally, verification of documentation procedure accuracy follows a standard model: technical communicators prepare a draft, which is submitted to subject matter experts for review. This process hinges on a number of factors that can adversely affect the quality of the review. Higher quality reviews are conducted by staff tasked specifically to test and review the draft procedures, and supply specific feedback by means of an established procedure. A well-established method of documentation testing provides several benefits to an organization. These include customer satisfaction, reduced costs, improved overall product quality, and improved document draft correction.
|
|
| |
There are 11 readers currently online: 1 registered user and 10 guests. Register.