Added by Geoff Sauer on Dec 14, 2003.
Average rating: 3.80/5.00 (n=5, std dev: 1.30)
 


User testing typically consists of a sort of fishing trip. We lower a lure (the user) into the water (the application or site) and see what critters (defects) bite. This is a valuable and time-tested approach. But when we start fishing for defects, we are left with some tough questions. For instance: When are we finished? How many defects do we need to find before we have fully tested the site or application? If we find a defect, how do we know how severe it is, and by what measure? In iterative testing, how do we compare results from the test of the current version with results from testing earlier versions?
 
  View all 311 works published by Boxes and Arrows  

Please share your rating/opinion of "Don't Test Users, Test Hypotheses".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués