 | |  |  | 

About three years ago we were asked whether we would be interested in writing a new and different kind of style manual:
* In addition to covering all the traditional style topics, such as capitalization and punctuation, it would have chapters on grammar, confusable words, usage (including bias-free language), and all aspects of production, from design and typography to desktop publishing and printing.
* Its audience would be the vast majority of working writers and editors, not just those who work with scholarly manuscripts.
* It would be written and organized in a friendly, easy-to-read style and reflect the impact of the computer on every aspect of the publishing process.
Although we were a bit cowed at the thought of tackling such a big project -- it turned out to be 836 pages -- we didn't see how we could turn down the chance to create a guide that was truly useful. View both works by Sutcliffe, Andrea J. View all 62 works published by Editorial Eye, The |
 The Reference Book That Editorial Eye Built A user has reported that the URL we had indexed no longer works properly. This link is offline until a volunteer finds a new, valid URL for the work and updates our site.
Sutcliffe, Andrea J. Editorial Eye, The 2003
Abstract: About three years ago we were asked whether we would be interested in writing a new and different kind of style manual:
* In addition to covering all the traditional style topics, such as capitalization and punctuation, it would have chapters on grammar, confusable words, usage (including bias-free language), and all aspects of production, from design and typography to desktop publishing and printing.
* Its audience would be the vast majority of working writers and editors, not just those who work with scholarly manuscripts.
* It would be written and organized in a friendly, easy-to-read style and reflect the impact of the computer on every aspect of the publishing process.
Although we were a bit cowed at the thought of tackling such a big project -- it turned out to be 836 pages -- we didn't see how we could turn down the chance to create a guide that was truly useful.
|
 |
 |  |