Added by Geoff Sauer on Jan 07, 2003.
Average rating: 4.00/5.00 (n=2, std dev: 1.41)
 


How many of the usability problems identified in a heuristic evaluation are true usability problems? Several years ago, I published an article suggesting that many of the 'problems' identified by heuristic evaluators were not problems at all (Bailey, Allan and Raiello, 1992). Even so, many of us have continued to waste time and go to the expense of fixing many usability problems that were not problems. Recently, three research papers were published that provided some insights into the validity of heuristic evaluations (Catani and Biers, 1998; Rooden, et.al., 1999; Stanton and Stevenage, 1998). The articles discussed usability testing in three totally different domains with very similar results.
 
  View all 35 works by Bailey, Robert  
  View all 37 works published by Human Factors International  

Please share your rating/opinion of " Heuristic Evaluations vs. Usability Testing".
 PoorExcellent 
The link to this work seems to be broken.

Copyright © 2001-09 by the EServer. All rights reserved.Add a Work | Update this Work | Discussion Forum | Habitués